| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Animal Science North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7623
Animal model methodology was used to compute yearly measures of relative fertility of Holstein AI mating bulls based upon 70-d nonreturn of first breedings as reported to U.S. DHIA from 1988 through 1997. Estimated Relative Conception Rates (ERCR) were computed for bulls with a minimum of 50 first breedings in a single year using variance ratios 45.5 for mating bull, 45.5 for animal genetic effects, and 31 for permanent environment. The model assumed repeatability across lactations of 0.05 and included fixed effects of herd-year-month bred and classes of parity, early lactation energy-corrected milk and days open when bred. Estimates of fertility were greater for breedings to cows that were young, had low early lactation production, and were in late stages of lactation. ERCR were expressed as difference in nonreturn from the average AI mating bull of herdmates. Values ranged from –18 to +13. For ERCR computed from a minimum of 1000 breedings, 90% were within four units of zero. Early ERCR computed from a few breedings in a single year were tested for ability to predict later ERCR computed from a minimum of 1000 different breedings. Early ERCR computed from 300 or more matings accurately predicted later independent ERCR. For yearly estimates each based upon a minimum of 1000 breedings, 8% changed more than three units, and 4% declined more than three units. Correlations between ERCR and predicted transmitting abilities protein and type production index were significant but accounted for little variance. Correlations between ERCR and other traits were not significant.
Key Words: nonreturn • fertility • mating bull • animal model
Submitted on September 23, 1999
Accepted on March 21, 2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Modeling Nuisance Variables for Prediction of Service Sire Fertility J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2823 - 2835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Kuhn and J. L. Hutchison Prediction of Dairy Bull Fertility from Field Data: Use of Multiple Services and Identification and Utilization of Factors Affecting Bull Fertility J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2481 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Huang, S. Tsuruta, J. K. Bertrand, I. Misztal, T. J. Lawlor, and J. S. Clay Environmental Effects on Conception Rates of Holsteins in New York and Georgia J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 818 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. DeJarnette, C. G. Sattler, C. E. Marshall, and R. L. Nebel Voluntary Waiting Period Management Practices in Dairy Herds Participating in a Progeny Test Program J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 1073 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Cornwell, M. L. McGilliard, R. Kasimanickam, and R. L. Nebel Effect of sire fertility and timing of artificial insemination in a Presynch + Ovsynch protocol on first-service pregnancy rates. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2473 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. E. Shook Major advances in determining appropriate selection goals. J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1349 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ponsuksili, R. M. Brunner, T. Goldammer, C. Kuhn, C. Walz, S. Chomdej, D. Tesfaye, K. Schellander, K. Wimmers, and M. Schwerin Bovine NALP5, NALP8, and NALP9 Genes: Assignment to a QTL Region and the Expression in Adult Tissues, Oocytes, and Preimplantation Embryos Biol Reprod, March 1, 2006; 74(3): 577 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Averill, R. Rekaya, and K. Weigel Genetic Analysis of Male and Female Fertility Using Longitudinal Binary Data J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3947 - 3952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. VanRaden, A. H. Sanders, M. E. Tooker, R. H. Miller, H. D. Norman, M. T. Kuhn, and G. R. Wiggans Development of a National Genetic Evaluation for Cow Fertility J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2285 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Clay, B. T. McDaniel, and C. H. Brown Variances of and Correlations Among Progeny Tests for Reproductive Traits of Cows Sired by AI Bulls J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2307 - 2313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Weigel Improving the Reproductive Efficiency of Dairy Cattle through Genetic Selection J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E86 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. DeJarnette, C. E. Marshall, R. W. Lenz, D. R. Monke, W. H. Ayars, and C. G. Sattler Sustaining the Fertility of Artificially Inseminated Dairy Cattle: The Role of the Artificial Insemination Industry J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E93 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
