| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
2 Caine Veterinary Teaching Center, Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Caldwell 83605
3 Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
Our objectives were to investigate strategies for biosecurity, expansion, and culling for expanding dairy herds in the Upper Midwest. Eighteen dairies in Iowa and Wisconsin were visited, and dairy managers and veterinarians were interviewed to characterize five biosecurity practices, herd culling practices, vaccines administered, and ensuing disease status for the herds. The majority of herds that were interviewed failed to employ comprehensive biosecurity programs for incoming cattle. Nearly 60% of herds obtained cattle from sources for which it was difficult to document genetic backgrounds and health histories, fewer than half required health testing for incoming cattle, and approximately 50% quarantined new cattle on arrival. Despite high rates of vaccination for bovine viral diarrhea, all herd owners and managers indicated that herd biosecurity was compromised as a result of expansion. Half of the interviewed herds indicated that bovine viral diarrhea and papillomatous digital dermatitis were notable disease problems. Herds that obtained cattle with unknown backgrounds and health status experienced the largest number of diseases. Before expansion, the most frequently cited reasons for culling were reproductively unsound; low milk production; mastitis, poor udder health, and high SCC; during expansion, the strategic decision to cull cows for low milk production was used less often. In addition, the stochastic simulation model, DairyORACLE, was used to evaluate economic outcomes for several expansion alternatives. Five model scenarios studied were: base scenario (herd size was maintained) and four expansion scenarios—all paired combinations of heifer quality (high, low) and voluntary culling (implemented, not implemented). Culling for low milk production yielded an additional $23.29 annually (6-yr annuity) per cow, but on the basis of purchased replacements, no voluntary culling was most profitable. Purchasing high versus low quality replacement heifers for expansions returned an additional $113.54 annually ($681.24 total net present value) per heifer purchased. Many opportunities exist to improve cattle-related factors for dairy herd expansions, including the use of comprehensive biosecurity programs, realistic planning and budgeting for cattle purchases, and cost effective purchase and culling practices.
Key Words: dairy • herd-expansion • biosecurity • culling
Submitted on June 12, 2000
Accepted on November 13, 2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. W. Barkema, M. J. Green, A. J. Bradley, and R. N. Zadoks Invited review: The role of contagious disease in udder health J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 4717 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. McConnel, J. E. Lombard, B. A. Wagner, and F. B. Garry Evaluation of Factors Associated with Increased Dairy Cow Mortality on United States Dairy Operations J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1423 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. De Vries, M. Overton, J. Fetrow, K. Leslie, S. Eicker, and G. Rogers Exploring the Impact of Sexed Semen on the Structure of the Dairy Industry J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 847 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. J. Olynk and C. A. Wolf Expected Net Present Value of Pure and Mixed Sexed Semen Artificial Insemination Strategies in Dairy Heifers J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2569 - 2576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. Dernburg, J. Fabre, S. Philippe, P. Sulpice, and D. Calavas A Study of the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of French Dairy Farmers Toward the Farm Register J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1767 - 1774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Moore and M. Payne An Evaluation of Dairy Producer Emergency Preparedness and Farm Security Education J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 2052 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Hare, H. D. Norman, and J. R. Wright Survival rates and productive herd life of dairy cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3713 - 3720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Raymond, R. D. Wohrle, and D. R. Call Assessment and promotion of judicious antibiotic use on dairy farms in Washington State. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3228 - 3240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Weigel, R. W. Palmer, and D. Z. Caraviello Investigation of Factors Affecting Voluntary and Involuntary Culling in Expanding Dairy Herds in Wisconsin using Survival Analysis J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1482 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
