JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84 No. 4 792-798
© 2001 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by At-Taras, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Spahr, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by At-Taras, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Spahr, S. L.

Detection and Characterization of Estrus in Dairy Cattle with an Electronic Heatmount Detector and an Electronic Activity Tag

E. E. At-Taras 1 and S. L. Spahr 1

1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801

The length and onset of estrus was studied in 71 lactating dairy cows using an electronic heatmount sensor (HeatWatch; DDx Inc., Boulder, CO, DeForest, WI) and an electronic activity tag (Heat Seeker, Boumatic, Madison, WI). Three methods were used to determine estrus: 1) the electronic heatmount system, 2) an increased activity ratio algorithm determined by the Heat Seeker, and 3) an increased activity count algorithm calculated for each estrous period. Mounting and physical activity variables were characterized, and the effects of synchrony, parity, and weather on these variables were determined with data from two different trials. Cows in trial 1 were not synchronized, while cows in trial 2 were synchronized. The results of the study were consistent as follows: mean numbers of mounts were 6.70 ± 0.7 and 5.42 ± 0.80 for trials 1 and 2, respectively; each mount lasted 3.20 ± 0.19 s (trial 1) and 3.36 ± 0.42 s (trial 2). Total mounting activity averaged 5.83 ± 0.78 h per estrous period in trial 1 and 5.57 ± 1.02 h in trial 2. Estrus identified by the increased activity count algorithm corresponded more closely to standing mount activity (determined by the HeatWatch System) than did the increased activity ratio algorithm. Synchrony, parity, and weather did not have a direct effect on physical activity. Hot weather decreased the duration of standing mount activity significantly, but did not affect the number or duration of individual mounts. All three methods of estrus detection employed improved the efficiency of detection over visual observation.

Key Words: estrus detection • electronic activity tag • heatmount sensor

Submitted on March 23, 1998
Accepted on October 2, 2000




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Lovendahl and M. G. G. Chagunda
Short communication: Genetic variation in estrus activity traits
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4683 - 4688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.