JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84 No. 2 528-541
© 2001 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bewley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson-Smith, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bewley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson-Smith, D. B.

A Comparison of Free-Stall Barns Used by Modernized Wisconsin Dairies

J. Bewley 1, R. W. Palmer 1, and D. B. Jackson-Smith 2

1 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
2 Program on Agricultural Technology Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

A primary objective of the Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey was to compare features of free-stall barns available to dairy producers. This study used data from a large random sample of expanding dairy farms to determine whether the theoretical benefits of particular free-stall configurations bear out under on-farm conditions. Comparisons were made among herds using free-stall barns as their primary housing for new versus remodeled facilities, barn design, bedding used, feed-delivery design, manure removal strategies, animal restraint, maternity areas, overcrowding, and cooling methods. Producers who made the transition from tie-stall housing to free-stall housing were satisfied with this decision. New free-stall barns provided a more desirable environment for the herds than remodeled free-stall barns, although initial investments were higher. When new free-stall barns were compared, herds with four-row barns had higher production, lower somatic cell count, and higher stocking rates than herds with six-row barns. Respondents were more satisfied with four- and six-row barns than with two- and three-row barns. Respondents felt sand provided some advantages for cow comfort, while satisfaction with bedding cost and manure handling was higher with mattresses. Dairy Herd Improvement data showed no difference in milk production or somatic cell count for producers who chose sand or mattress-based free stalls. Respondents were more satisfied with the use of drive-through feeding than other feed-delivery designs. Most producers chose to use tractor scrapers to remove manure; however, producers who used automated systems were more satisfied with manure management. Few differences were observed when comparing self-locking head gates to palpation rails. Overcrowding did not have any adverse affect on production or user satisfaction with feed intake or cow comfort. Using supplemental cooling appeared to facilitate higher production.

Key Words: free stall • survey • expansion • housing

Submitted on June 5, 2000
Accepted on September 30, 2000




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Fregonesi, C. B. Tucker, and D. M. Weary
Overstocking Reduces Lying Time in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3349 - 3354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Z. Caraviello, K. A. Weigel, M. Craven, D. Gianola, N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, P. M. Fricke, and M. C. Wiltbank
Analysis of Reproductive Performance of Lactating Cows on Large Dairy Farms Using Machine Learning Algorithms
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4703 - 4722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Z. Caraviello, K. A. Weigel, P. M. Fricke, M. C. Wiltbank, M. J. Florent, N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, N. R. Zwald, and C. L. Rawson
Survey of Management Practices on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle on Large US Commercial Farms
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4723 - 4735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. E. Fernandez, R. A. Marino, and X. C. Carreira
Algorithms for dairy barn design: resting, feeding, and exercise.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2784 - 2798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. J. McLaren, K. D. Lissemore, T. F. Duffield, K. E. Leslie, D. F. Kelton, and B. Grexton
The Association of Herd Milk Production and Management with a Return-Over-Feed Index in Ontario Dairy Herds
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 419 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. B. Cook, T. B. Bennett, and K. V. Nordlund
Effect of Free Stall Surface on Daily Activity Patterns in Dairy Cows with Relevance to Lameness Prevalence
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 2912 - 2922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Zdanowicz, J. A. Shelford, C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Bacterial Populations on Teat Ends of Dairy Cows Housed in Free Stalls and Bedded with Either Sand or Sawdust
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1694 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. A. Weigel, R. W. Palmer, and D. Z. Caraviello
Investigation of Factors Affecting Voluntary and Involuntary Culling in Expanding Dairy Herds in Wisconsin using Survival Analysis
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1482 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.