JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84 No. 12 2803-2812
© 2001 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, J.

Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle Using Test-Day Models

J. Jensen 1

1 Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Research Centre Foulum, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

Recently there has been considerable interest in modeling individual test-day records (TDR) for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle as a replacement for the traditional use of estimated accumulated 305-d yields. Some advantages of test-day models (TDM) include the ability to account for environmental effects of each test day, the ability to model the trajectory of the lactation for individual genotypes or groups of animals, and the possibility of genetic evaluations for persistency of production. Also, the use of test-day models avoids the necessity of extending short lactations on culled animals and animals with records in progress. The disadvantages of TDM include computational difficulties associated with analyzing much larger datasets and the need to estimate many more parameters than in a traditional 305-d lactation model. Several different models have been proposed to model the trajectory of the lactation, including so-called "biological functions", various polynomials and character process models. At present, there is not universal agreement on which models to use in routine prediction of breeding values and better methods to compare models are desirable. Obtaining accurate estimates of the dispersion parameters to use in TDM remains a challenge. Methods used include a two-step procedure in which the dispersion parameters are estimated in a series of multivariate models followed by a reduction in order of fit using covariance functions, and a one-step procedure in which the parameters of TDM are estimated using restricted maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods in a random regression model. Further research should focus on including multiple lactation data and accounting for heterogeneity variance.

Key Words: genetic evaluation • test-day model • random regression • model choice

Submitted on April 18, 2001
Accepted on July 31, 2001




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. Hickey, M. G. Keane, D. A. Kenny, A. R. Cromie, P. R. Amer, and R. F. Veerkamp
Heterogeneity of Genetic Parameters for Calving Difficulty in Holstein Heifers in Ireland
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3900 - 3908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Koivula, J. I. Nousiainen, J. Nousiainen, and E. A. Mantysaari
Use of Herd Solutions from a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Diagnostic Dairy Herd Management
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2563 - 2568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Hickey, M. G. Keane, D. A. Kenny, A. R. Cromie, and R. F. Veerkamp
Genetic parameters for EUROP carcass traits within different groups of cattle in Ireland
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 314 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. T. Luo, R. Q. Yang, and N. Yang
Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Cumulative Egg Numbers in a Broiler Dam Line by Using a Random Regression Model
Poult. Sci., January 1, 2007; 86(1): 30 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Averill, R. Rekaya, and K. Weigel
Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data.
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3681 - 3689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Yang, Q. Tian, and S. Xu
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Longitudinal Traits in Line Crosses
Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2339 - 2356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Karacaoren, F. Jaffrezic, and H. N. Kadarmideen
Genetic Parameters for Functional Traits in Dairy Cattle from Daily Random Regression Models
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 791 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. M. Sawalha, J. F. Keown, S. D. Kachman, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle with Test-Day Models with Autoregressive Covariance Structures and with a 305-d Model
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3346 - 3353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Odegard, G. Klemetsdal, and B. Heringstad
Genetic Improvement in Mastitis Resistance: Comparison of Selection Criteria from Cross-Sectional and Random Regression Sire Models for Somatic Cell Score
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1515 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. M. Silvestre, F. Petim-Batista, and J. Colaco
Genetic Parameter Estimates of Portuguese Dairy Cows for Milk, Fat, and Protein Using a Spline Test-Day Model
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1225 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Vasconcelos, A. Martins, M. F. Petim-Batista, J. Colaco, R. W. Blake, and J. Carvalheira
Prediction of Daily and Lactation Yields of Milk, Fat, and Protein Using an Autoregressive Repeatability Test Day Model
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2591 - 2598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Mark
Applied Genetic Evaluations for Production and Functional Traits in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2641 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. I. Weller and E. Ezra
Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. P. P. Macciotta, D. Vicario, C. Di Mauro, and A. Cappio-Borlino
A Multivariate Approach to Modeling Shapes of Individual Lactation Curves in Cattle
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2004; 87(4): 1092 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. D. Dechow, G. W. Rogers, L. Klei, and T. J. Lawlor
Heritability and Correlations for Body Condition Score and Dairy Form Within and Across Lactation and Age
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2004; 87(3): 717 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. J. Tempelman
Experimental design and statistical methods for classical and bioequivalence hypothesis testing with an application to dairy nutrition studies
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E162 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Odegard, J. Jensen, G. Klemetsdal, P. Madsen, and B. Heringstad
Genetic Analysis of Somatic Cell Score in Norwegian Cattle Using Random Regression Test-Day Models
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4103 - 4114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Heringstad, Y. M. Chang, D. Gianola, and G. Klemetsdal
Genetic Analysis of Longitudinal Trajectory of Clinical Mastitis in First-Lactation Norwegian Cattle
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2003; 86(8): 2676 - 2683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Druet, F. Jaffrezic, D. Boichard, and V. Ducrocq
Modeling Lactation Curves and Estimation of Genetic Parameters for First Lactation Test-Day Records of French Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(7): 2480 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.