JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84 No. 1 299-305
© 2001 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Poore, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Poore, M. H.

Deep-Stacked Broiler Litter as a Protein Supplement for Dairy Replacement Heifers

B. A. Hopkins 1 and M. H. Poore 1

1 Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7621

Fifty Holstein dairy heifers, [two replications of 25 heifers; average body weight (BW) 227 kg], were assigned to one of the following treatments for 105 d. Treatments 1 through 4 are given as the percentage of supplemental crude protein (CP) from soybean meal and deep-stacked broiler litter, respectively: 1) 100 and 0%; 2) 67 and 33%; 3) 33 and 67%; 4) 0 and 100%; and 5) 67% of supplementary CP from deep-stacked broiler litter and 33% from a source of rumen undegradable protein (RUP). All rations were formulated to contain 15% CP and 68% TDNon a dry matter basis. Dry matter intake was not significantly different among treatments at 10.1, 10.2, 10.4, 9.4, and 9.1 kg/d for treatments 1 through 5, respectively. Average daily BW gains (1.35, 1.37, 1.28, 1.17, and 1.24 kg/d for treatments 1 through 5, respectively) decreased linearly as the level of litter feeding increased and was not influenced by increasing RUP in treatment 5. Feed efficiency was not affected by the level of deep-stacked broiler litter feeding. Ruminal ammonia and plasma urea nitrogen concentrations decreased linearly as the level of litter feeding increased. Feeding additional RUP decreased ruminal ammonia concentration in treatment 5 to a level similar to treatment 4. This suggests that the protein in deep-stacked broiler litter may be more undegradable than that in soybean meal and that RUP in broiler litter may be higher than previously thought. Results from this study indicate that deep-stacked broiler litter has potential as a low-cost CP source for growing dairy heifers.

Key Words: protein • heifers • broiler litter • growth

Submitted on May 15, 2000
Accepted on September 5, 2000




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. F. Kertz and H. Chester-Jones
Invited Review: Guidelines for Measuring and Reporting Calf and Heifer Experimental Data
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3577 - 3580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. J. Capucille, M. H. Poore, and G. M. Rogers
Growing and finishing performance of steers when fed recycled poultry bedding during the growing period
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 3038 - 3048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.