|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Clinical and Population Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
2 Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
3 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
4 Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
All DHI test-day data, including milk urea concentrations measured by infrared test method, were collected from 60 commercial Ontario Holstein dairy herds for a 13-mo period between December 1, 1995, and December 31, 1996. The objectives of this study were to describe the relationships between milk urea concentrations and seasonal factors, sampling factors, cow factors, and test-day production of milk, milk fat, protein, and SCC. Milk urea was associated with month and season; concentrations were the highest from July to September. Milk urea was generally lower in first-lactation cows. Milk urea was lowest during the first 60 d of lactation, higher between 60 and 150 d in milk, and lower after approximately 150 d in milk. In herds on an alternating a.m./ p.m. test schedule, milk urea was generally lower in a.m. than p.m. tests. There was a positive nonlinear association between milk urea and milk yield, fat-corrected milk, and energy-corrected milk. There was a negative nonlinear association between milk urea and both milk fat and total protein percentages. While there was a negative nonlinear association between cow-level milk urea and linear score, the study found no association between herd average milk urea and herd average linear score. The associations described in this study using Dairy Herd Improvement test-day samples from commercial dairy herds and using an infrared test to measure milk urea are generally consistent with results from studies that used individual animals housed under research conditions and chemical methods to measure milk urea. Because milk urea varies by season, month, parity group, stage of lactation, and sample type, studies should control for these variables. Because of the apparent effect of a.m. and p.m. sampling on urea concentration, producers on an alternating a.m./p.m. test schedule should test routinely to establish a herd pattern for urea and submit the same sampling time consistently or both.
Submitted on April 6, 2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Bastin, L. Laloux, A. Gillon, F. Miglior, H. Soyeurt, H. Hammami, C. Bertozzi, and N. Gengler Modeling milk urea of Walloon dairy cows in management perspectives J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3529 - 3540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. K. Park, H. C. Koo, S. H. Kim, S. Y. Hwang, W. K. Jung, J. M. Kim, S. Shin, R. T. Kim, and Y. H. Park The Analysis of Milk Components and Pathogenic Bacteria Isolated from Bovine Raw Milk in Korea J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5405 - 5414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Wattiaux, E. V. Nordheim, and P. Crump Statistical Evaluation of Factors and Interactions Affecting Dairy Herd Improvement Milk Urea Nitrogen in Commercial Midwest Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 3020 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Negri, M. S. Chavez, M. A. Taverna, A. L. Cuatrin, and A. C. Rubiolo Note: The Effect of Silo Milk Composition Parameters on Heat Stability of Whole Milk Powder Food Science and Technology International, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Wattiaux and K. L. Karg Protein Level for Alfalfa and Corn Silage-Based Diets: I. Lactational Response and Milk Urea Nitrogen J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3480 - 3491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Johnson and A. J. Young The Association Between Milk Urea Nitrogen and DHI Production Variables in Western Commercial Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2003; 86(9): 3008 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Rajala-Schultz and W. J. A. Saville Sources of Variation in Milk Urea Nitrogen in Ohio Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1653 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |