JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 83 No. 7 1530-1542
© 2000 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, P. T.

A Method to Analyze Production Responses in Dairy Herds

J. D. Ferguson 1, D. K. Beede 2, R. D. Shaver 3, C. E. Polan 4, J. T. Huber 5, and P. T. Chandler 6

1 Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square, PA 19348
2 Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1225
3 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
4 Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg 24061-0315
5 Department of Animal Science, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721
6 P.O. Box 87, Dresden, TN 38225

Milk production was simulated in a 50-cow herd averaging 8182 kg of 305-d milk with a standard deviation of 1364 kg. Herd demographics were 35% first lactation, 20% second lactation, and 45% third or greater lactation cows. A lactation model was developed with the Wood's equation (Milk/d = A*DIM*e (;–c*dim)) to which random variation was added to be consistent with a coefficient of variation of 10% for daily milk production. Five sequential sampling periods, 30 d apart, were randomly selected for the experiment. For each of these sampling periods data were simulated for cow, lactation number, milk, and days in milk (DIM). To the third sampling period, a known input was pulsed into each cow record to simulate a change in milk production. Inputs and number of herds simulated were –1.140 kg and 15 herds, 0.909 kg and 30 herds, –0.455 kg and 20 herds, 0 kg and 65 herds, 0.455 kg and 21 herds, –0.909 kg and 47 herds, 1.140 kg and 20 herds, and 2.270 kg and 15 herds. Regression by cow was used to estimate milk production change for the known inputs: Milkijk = Intercept + betai*DIMij + TRTik + epsiijk. Parameter estimates for each cow were submitted to analysis of variance with herd as a class variable. The least square mean of TRT (dummy variable for known input of milk volume change) for herd was tested for difference from zero based on a "t" statistic. Herd responses were classed as negative, not different from zero, and greater than zero based on P < 0.10. Herd responses were categorized based on the known input to assess the ability of the method to detect a change in production. The mean estimate of TRT from the regression analysis was used to assess the ability of the method to estimate the magnitude of the known input. The regression method was able to detect changes in production greater than 0.455 kg, but is more useful when changes of 0.9 kg or greater are shown. Adjustment for days postcalving on first test day is necessary to correct for the bias in linear regression to estimate response across the curvilinear milk production function.

Key Words: milk production • milk production change • dairy cattle • simulation

Submitted on August 5, 1999
Accepted on January 31, 2000




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Carriquiry, W. J. Weber, C. R. Dahlen, G. C. Lamb, L. H. Baumgard, and B. A. Crooker
Production response of multiparous Holstein cows treated with bovine somatotropin and fed diets enriched with n-3 or n-6 fatty acids
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 4852 - 4864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Kristensen, S. Ostergaard, M. A. Krogh, and C. Enevoldsen
Technical Indicators of Financial Performance in the Dairy Herd
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 620 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. J. Weber, C. R. Wallace, L. B. Hansen, H. Chester-Jones, and B. A. Crooker
Effects of Genetic Selection for Milk Yield on Somatotropin, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, and Placental Lactogen in Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3314 - 3325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. K. Kay, W. J. Weber, C. E. Moore, D. E. Bauman, L. B. Hansen, H. Chester-Jones, B. A. Crooker, and L. H. Baumgard
Effects of Week of Lactation and Genetic Selection for Milk Yield on Milk Fatty Acid Composition in Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3886 - 3893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.