|
|
||||||||
1 Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
2 Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
3 Food Animal Protection Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, College Station, TX 77845
Behavioral and physiological changes were measured following tail-docking in primiparous heifers. One month before projected first parturition, 21 heifers were assigned to control (nondocked), docked, or docked with lidocaine groups. Heifers were banded to initiate tail-docking and the necrotic tail was removed after 144 h. Physiological, immunological, and behavioral measures were taken for 240 h following banding. Cortisol was not different for control and treated heifers. Haptoglobin increased for docked heifers by 168 h postbanding (24 h postdocking). alpha1-Acid glycoprotein decreased as haptoglobin increased, and
1-acid glycoprotein increased until 240 h postbanding. Tumor necrosis factor-
increased only with lidocaine and did not show an effect of docking by 240 h postbanding. Lymphocyte phenotyping demonstrated increased CD4+ and CD8+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells for docked plus lidocaine heifers and 
+ cells of those heifers tended to be reduced compared with docked heifers. Eating was the only maintenance behavior affected by banding in both docked groups (increased with banding and decreased with docking). The initial banding procedure did not alter heifer physiology and altered only eating behavior, but the cutting of the tail (docking) increased haptoglobin in response to the tissue damage and returned eating behavior to baseline. The use of lidocaine to anesthetize the tail before banding affected lymphocyte phenotypes and TNF-
(banding alone did not alter these parameters).
Key Words: tail-docking behavior physiology
Submitted on August 3, 2000
Accepted on February 2, 2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Fahey and H. W. Cheng Group Size and Density Effects on Physical Indices and Cell-Mediated Immunity in Two Genetic Lines of White Leghorn Layers Poult. Sci., December 1, 2008; 87(12): 2500 - 2504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dennis, H. M. Zhang, and H. W. Cheng Effect of Selection for Resistance and Susceptibility to Viral Diseases on Concentrations of Dopamine and Immunological Parameters in Six-Week-Old Chickens Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2135 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Eicher, H. W. Cheng, A. D. Sorrells, and M. M. Schutz Short communication: behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3047 - 3051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Arthington, S. D. Eicher, W. E. Kunkle, and F. G. Martin Effect of transportation and commingling on the acute-phase protein response, growth, and feed intake of newly weaned beef calves J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1120 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. L. Ting, B. Earley, J. M. L. Hughes, and M. A. Crowe Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth, and behavior J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1281 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Schreiner and P. L. Ruegg Responses to Tail Docking in Calves and Heifers J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2002; 85(12): 3287 - 3296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Eicher and J. W. Dailey Indicators of Acute Pain and Fly Avoidance Behaviors in Holstein Calves Following Tail-docking J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2002; 85(11): 2850 - 2858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Schreiner and P. L. Ruegg Effects of Tail Docking on Milk Quality and Cow Cleanliness J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2002; 85(10): 2503 - 2511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Tom, I. J. H. Duncan, T. M. Widowski, K. G. Bateman, and K. E. Leslie Effects of Tail Docking Using a Rubber Ring With or Without Anesthetic on Behavior and Production of Lactating Cows J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2002; 85(9): 2257 - 2265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |