JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 83 No. 5 1135-1144
© 2000 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Doormaal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Van Doormaal, J.

Experience with a Test-Day Model

L. R. Schaeffer 1, J. Jamrozik 1, G. J. Kistemaker 1, and J. Van Doormaal 2

1 Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
2 Canadian Dairy Network, 150 Research Lane, Suite 307, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 4T2

The Canadian Test-Day Model is a 12-trait random regression animal model in which traits are milk, fat, and protein test-day yields, and somatic cell scores on test days within each of first three lactations. Test-day records from later lactations are not used. Random regressions (genetic and permanent environmental) were based on Wilmink's three parameter function that includes an intercept, regression on days in milk, and regression on an exponential function to the power –0.05 times days in milk. The model was applied to over 22 million test-day records of over 1.4 million cows in seven dairy breeds for cows first calving since 1988. A theoretical comparison of test-day model to 305-d complete lactation animal model is given. Each animal in an analysis receives 36 additive genetic solutions (12 traits by three regression coefficients), and these are combined to give one estimated breeding value (EBV) for each of milk, fat, and protein yields, average daily somatic cell score and milk yield persistency (for bulls only). Correlation of yield EBV with previous 305-d lactation model EBV for bulls was 0.97 and for cows was 0.93 (Holsteins). A question is whether EBV for yield traits for each lactation should be combined into one overall EBV, and if so, what method to combine them. Implementation required development of new methods for approximation of reliabilities of EBV, inclusion of cows without test day records in analysis, but which were still alive and had progeny with test-day records, adjustments for heterogeneous herd-test date variances, and international comparisons. Efforts to inform the dairy industry about changes in EBV due to the model and recovering information needed to explain changes in specific animals' EBV are significant challenges. The Canadian dairy industry will require a year or more to become comfortable with the test-day model and to realize the impact it could have on selection decisions.

Key Words: genetic evaluation • test-day model • random regressions • production

Submitted on June 21, 1999
Accepted on November 11, 1999




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. J. Wilson, Y. T. Grohn, G. J. Bennett, R. N. Gonzalez, Y. H. Schukken, and J. Spatz
Milk Production Change Following Clinical Mastitis and Reproductive Performance Compared Among J5 Vaccinated and Control Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3869 - 3879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. Soyeurt, P. Dardenne, F. Dehareng, C. Bastin, and N. Gengler
Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Content and the Ratio of Saturated to Unsaturated Fatty Acids in Bovine Milk
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3611 - 3626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Bohmanova, F. Miglior, J. Jamrozik, I. Misztal, and P. G. Sullivan
Comparison of Random Regression Models with Legendre Polynomials and Linear Splines for Production Traits and Somatic Cell Score of Canadian Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3627 - 3638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Caccamo, R. F. Veerkamp, G. de Jong, M. H. Pool, R. Petriglieri, and G. Licitra
Variance Components for Test-Day Milk, Fat, and Protein Yield, and Somatic Cell Score for Analyzing Management Information
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3268 - 3276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. Togashi and C. Y. Lin
Genetic Improvement of Total Milk Yield and Total Lactation Persistency of the First Three Lactations in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2836 - 2843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Negussie, I. Stranden, and E. A. Mantysaari
Genetic Association of Clinical Mastitis with Test-Day Somatic Cell Score and Milk Yield During First Lactation of Finnish Ayrshire Cows
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1189 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, P. M. VanRaden, F. Miglior, and G. de Jong
Consistency of Maturity Rate for Milk Yield Across Countries and Generations
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3937 - 3944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Miglior, A. Sewalem, J. Jamrozik, J. Bohmanova, D. M. Lefebvre, and R. K. Moore
Genetic Analysis of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Lactose and Their Relationships with Other Production Traits in Canadian Holstein Cattle
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2468 - 2479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. L. Muir, G. Kistemaker, J. Jamrozik, and F. Canavesi
Genetic Parameters for a Multiple-Trait Multiple-Lactation Random Regression Test-Day Model in Italian Holsteins
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1564 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. M. Sogstad, O. Osteras, T. Fjeldaas, and A. O. Refsdal
Bovine Claw and Limb Disorders at Claw Trimming Related to Milk Yield
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 749 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. M. Silvestre, F. Petim-Batista, and J. Colaco
The Accuracy of Seven Mathematical Functions in Modeling Dairy Cattle Lactation Curves Based on Test-Day Records From Varying Sample Schemes
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1813 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. Barrett, F. Miglior, G. Jansen, J. Jamrozik, and L. R. Schaeffer
Joint International Evaluation of Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle for Production Traits
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3326 - 3336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, and P. M. VanRaden
Impact of Maturity Rate of Daughters on Genetic Ranking of Holstein Bulls
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3337 - 3345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Sithole, I. Dohoo, K. Leslie, L. DesCoteaux, S. Godden, J. Campbell, H. Stryhn, and J. Sanchez
Effect of Eprinomectin Treatment at Calving on Milk Production in Dairy Herds with Limited Outdoor Exposure
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 929 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. P. P. Macciotta, D. Vicario, and A. Cappio-Borlino
Detection of Different Shapes of Lactation Curve for Milk Yield in Dairy Cattle by Empirical Mathematical Models
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1178 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. L. Muir, J. Fatehi, and L. R. Schaeffer
Genetic Relationships Between Persistency and Reproductive Performance in First-Lactation Canadian Holsteins
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 3029 - 3037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt, A. Bunger, and R. Reents
Derivation and Calculation of Approximate Reliabilities and Daughter Yield-Deviations of a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1896 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. A. Mulder, A. F. Groen, G. De Jong, and P. Bijma
Genotype x Environment Interaction for Yield and Somatic Cell Score with Automatic and Conventional Milking Systems
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1487 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. I. Weller and E. Ezra
Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Jamrozik, I. Stranden, and L. R. Schaeffer
Random Regression Test-Day Models with Residuals Following a Student's-t Distribution
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2004; 87(3): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. H. Jakobsen, R. Rekaya, J. Jensen, D. A. Sorensen, P. Madsen, D. Gianola, L. G. Christensen, and J. Pedersen
Bayesian Estimates of Covariance Components Between Lactation Curve Parameters and Disease Liability in Danish Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2003; 86(9): 3000 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. M. Wood, P. J. Boettcher, J. Jamrozik, G. B. Jansen, and D. F. Kelton
Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Concentrations of Milk Urea Nitrogen
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(7): 2462 - 2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.