|
|
||||||||
1 Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
2 Canadian Dairy Network, 150 Research Lane, Suite 307, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 4T2
The Canadian Test-Day Model is a 12-trait random regression animal model in which traits are milk, fat, and protein test-day yields, and somatic cell scores on test days within each of first three lactations. Test-day records from later lactations are not used. Random regressions (genetic and permanent environmental) were based on Wilmink's three parameter function that includes an intercept, regression on days in milk, and regression on an exponential function to the power 0.05 times days in milk. The model was applied to over 22 million test-day records of over 1.4 million cows in seven dairy breeds for cows first calving since 1988. A theoretical comparison of test-day model to 305-d complete lactation animal model is given. Each animal in an analysis receives 36 additive genetic solutions (12 traits by three regression coefficients), and these are combined to give one estimated breeding value (EBV) for each of milk, fat, and protein yields, average daily somatic cell score and milk yield persistency (for bulls only). Correlation of yield EBV with previous 305-d lactation model EBV for bulls was 0.97 and for cows was 0.93 (Holsteins). A question is whether EBV for yield traits for each lactation should be combined into one overall EBV, and if so, what method to combine them. Implementation required development of new methods for approximation of reliabilities of EBV, inclusion of cows without test day records in analysis, but which were still alive and had progeny with test-day records, adjustments for heterogeneous herd-test date variances, and international comparisons. Efforts to inform the dairy industry about changes in EBV due to the model and recovering information needed to explain changes in specific animals' EBV are significant challenges. The Canadian dairy industry will require a year or more to become comfortable with the test-day model and to realize the impact it could have on selection decisions.
Key Words: genetic evaluation test-day model random regressions production
Submitted on June 21, 1999
Accepted on November 11, 1999
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Wilson, Y. T. Grohn, G. J. Bennett, R. N. Gonzalez, Y. H. Schukken, and J. Spatz Milk Production Change Following Clinical Mastitis and Reproductive Performance Compared Among J5 Vaccinated and Control Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3869 - 3879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Soyeurt, P. Dardenne, F. Dehareng, C. Bastin, and N. Gengler Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Content and the Ratio of Saturated to Unsaturated Fatty Acids in Bovine Milk J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3611 - 3626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bohmanova, F. Miglior, J. Jamrozik, I. Misztal, and P. G. Sullivan Comparison of Random Regression Models with Legendre Polynomials and Linear Splines for Production Traits and Somatic Cell Score of Canadian Holstein Cows J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3627 - 3638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Caccamo, R. F. Veerkamp, G. de Jong, M. H. Pool, R. Petriglieri, and G. Licitra Variance Components for Test-Day Milk, Fat, and Protein Yield, and Somatic Cell Score for Analyzing Management Information J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3268 - 3276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Togashi and C. Y. Lin Genetic Improvement of Total Milk Yield and Total Lactation Persistency of the First Three Lactations in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2836 - 2843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Negussie, I. Stranden, and E. A. Mantysaari Genetic Association of Clinical Mastitis with Test-Day Somatic Cell Score and Milk Yield During First Lactation of Finnish Ayrshire Cows J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1189 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, P. M. VanRaden, F. Miglior, and G. de Jong Consistency of Maturity Rate for Milk Yield Across Countries and Generations J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3937 - 3944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Miglior, A. Sewalem, J. Jamrozik, J. Bohmanova, D. M. Lefebvre, and R. K. Moore Genetic Analysis of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Lactose and Their Relationships with Other Production Traits in Canadian Holstein Cattle J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2468 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Muir, G. Kistemaker, J. Jamrozik, and F. Canavesi Genetic Parameters for a Multiple-Trait Multiple-Lactation Random Regression Test-Day Model in Italian Holsteins J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1564 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Sogstad, O. Osteras, T. Fjeldaas, and A. O. Refsdal Bovine Claw and Limb Disorders at Claw Trimming Related to Milk Yield J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 749 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Silvestre, F. Petim-Batista, and J. Colaco The Accuracy of Seven Mathematical Functions in Modeling Dairy Cattle Lactation Curves Based on Test-Day Records From Varying Sample Schemes J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1813 - 1821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Barrett, F. Miglior, G. Jansen, J. Jamrozik, and L. R. Schaeffer Joint International Evaluation of Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle for Production Traits J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3326 - 3336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, and P. M. VanRaden Impact of Maturity Rate of Daughters on Genetic Ranking of Holstein Bulls J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3337 - 3345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sithole, I. Dohoo, K. Leslie, L. DesCoteaux, S. Godden, J. Campbell, H. Stryhn, and J. Sanchez Effect of Eprinomectin Treatment at Calving on Milk Production in Dairy Herds with Limited Outdoor Exposure J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 929 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. P. Macciotta, D. Vicario, and A. Cappio-Borlino Detection of Different Shapes of Lactation Curve for Milk Yield in Dairy Cattle by Empirical Mathematical Models J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1178 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Muir, J. Fatehi, and L. R. Schaeffer Genetic Relationships Between Persistency and Reproductive Performance in First-Lactation Canadian Holsteins J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 3029 - 3037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt, A. Bunger, and R. Reents Derivation and Calculation of Approximate Reliabilities and Daughter Yield-Deviations of a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1896 - 1907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Mulder, A. F. Groen, G. De Jong, and P. Bijma Genotype x Environment Interaction for Yield and Somatic Cell Score with Automatic and Conventional Milking Systems J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1487 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Weller and E. Ezra Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jamrozik, I. Stranden, and L. R. Schaeffer Random Regression Test-Day Models with Residuals Following a Student's-t Distribution J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2004; 87(3): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Jakobsen, R. Rekaya, J. Jensen, D. A. Sorensen, P. Madsen, D. Gianola, L. G. Christensen, and J. Pedersen Bayesian Estimates of Covariance Components Between Lactation Curve Parameters and Disease Liability in Danish Holstein Cows J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2003; 86(9): 3000 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Wood, P. J. Boettcher, J. Jamrozik, G. B. Jansen, and D. F. Kelton Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Concentrations of Milk Urea Nitrogen J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(7): 2462 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |