Theoretical Basis and Computational Methods for Different Test-Day Genetic Evaluation Methods

¹ Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics University of Goettingen, Goettingen 37075, Germany

In test-day (TD) models, records from individual test days are used to determine lactation production instead of aggregating records. Test-day models have recently gained considerable interest because they are more flexible in handling records from different recording schemes. Compared with only using records of complete lactations, they can reduce the generation interval through frequent genetic evaluations with the latest data. Test-day models can predict total production more accurately by accounting for time-dependent environmental effects. Test-day models may be separated into three groups: First, two-step models under which corrections are carried out at TD level and subsequently corrected TD records are processed in an aggregated form as lactation records. Second, fixed regression models assume that TD records within a lactation are repeated records. Because yields in the course of the lactation follow a curvilinear pattern, this curve can be considered by using suitable covariates. Third, random regression models additionally define the animal's genetic effect by using regression coefficients and allowing for covariances among them. The difference between random regression and fixed regression models is that the genetic merit of an individual is allowed to differ in the course of the lactation in random regression models. Random regressions are related to the approach of defining covariance functions for longitudinal data. Computationally, TD models are very demanding. For evaluations on a national scale, the size of the equation system can go to hundreds of millions of equations, depending on the size of the database and the specific model defined.

Key Words: genetic evaluation • test-day model • computational methods

Submitted on July 29, 1999
Accepted on November 23, 1999

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Koivula, J. I. Nousiainen, J. Nousiainen, and E. A. Mantysaari Use of Herd Solutions from a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Diagnostic Dairy Herd Management J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2563 - 2568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. T. Luo, R. Q. Yang, and N. Yang Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Cumulative Egg Numbers in a Broiler Dam Line by Using a Random Regression Model Poult. Sci., January 1, 2007; 86(1): 30 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Averill, R. Rekaya, and K. Weigel Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3681 - 3689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Yang, Q. Tian, and S. Xu Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Longitudinal Traits in Line Crosses Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2339 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Cole and P. M. VanRaden Genetic evaluation and best prediction of lactation persistency. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2722 - 2728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Karacaoren, F. Jaffrezic, and H. N. Kadarmideen Genetic Parameters for Functional Traits in Dairy Cattle from Daily Random Regression Models J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 791 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Sawalha, J. F. Keown, S. D. Kachman, and L. D. Van Vleck Evaluation of Autoregressive Covariance Structures for Test-Day Records of Holstein Cows: Estimates of Parameters J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2632 - 2642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Silvestre, F. Petim-Batista, and J. Colaco Genetic Parameter Estimates of Portuguese Dairy Cows for Milk, Fat, and Protein Using a Spline Test-Day Model J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1225 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Vasconcelos, A. Martins, M. F. Petim-Batista, J. Colaco, R. W. Blake, and J. Carvalheira Prediction of Daily and Lactation Yields of Milk, Fat, and Protein Using an Autoregressive Repeatability Test Day Model J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2591 - 2598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Mulder, A. F. Groen, G. De Jong, and P. Bijma Genotype x Environment Interaction for Yield and Somatic Cell Score with Automatic and Conventional Milking Systems J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1487 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I. Weller and E. Ezra Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. P. Macciotta, D. Vicario, C. Di Mauro, and A. Cappio-Borlino A Multivariate Approach to Modeling Shapes of Individual Lactation Curves in Cattle J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2004; 87(4): 1092 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Heringstad, Y. M. Chang, D. Gianola, and G. Klemetsdal Genetic Analysis of Longitudinal Trajectory of Clinical Mastitis in First-Lactation Norwegian Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2003; 86(8): 2676 - 2683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]