JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 83 No. 5 1081-1088
© 2000 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, R. L.

Retrospective Analysis of the Accuracy of Conversion Equations and Multiple-Trait, Across-Country Evaluations of Holstein Bulls used Internationally

K. A. Weigel 1 and R. L. Powell 2

1 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
2 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 20705-2350

In 1995, the multiple-trait across country genetic evaluation procedure replaced regression-based conversion equations as the preferred method for international genetic comparisons of dairy bulls. In the present study, February 1999 estimated breeding values of 632 foreign Holstein bulls that were used in Canada, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, and the US were compared with January 1995 predictions from home country data only. January 1995 predicted breeding values for each importing country were calculated using three methods: the multiple-trait, across-country evaluation procedure; conversion equations based on the multiple-trait, across-country evaluations; and conversion equations based on the Wilmink method. Mean correlations between 1999 estimated breeding values in the importing countries and 1995 predictions from international data were from 0.76 to 0.81 for all methods. The multiple-trait, across-country evaluation procedure is expected to lead to selection of different bulls, because bulls were allowed to be ranked differently in each country, but no significant increase in accuracy of selection was observed. The lack of improvement in accuracy of prediction was most likely due to limitations in data structure. International genetic comparisons are largely driven by data from a relatively small number of evaluated bulls with exported semen. Data from siblings and more distant relatives provide only weak, indirect genetic links between countries, and inclusion of such data seems to provide a minimal improvement in accuracy. Limitations in data structure might be alleviated by methods that define environments by climate or management factors rather than country borders.

Key Words: international conversion • multiple-trait • across-country evaluation

Submitted on August 25, 1997
Accepted on December 8, 1999




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. Powell, A. H. Sanders, and H. D. Norman
Impact of Estimated Genetic Correlations on International Evaluations to Predict Milk Traits
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3679 - 3687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. D. Norman, P. M. VanRaden, R. L. Powell, J. R. Wright, and W. R. VerBoort
Effectiveness of National and Regional Sire Evaluations in Predicting Future-Daughter Milk Yield
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 812 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. Powell, A. H. Sanders, and H. D. Norman
Accuracy of Foreign Dairy Bull Evaluations in Predicting United States Evaluations for Yield
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2621 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. Powell and P. M. VanRaden
International Dairy Bull Evaluations Expressed on National, Subglobal, and Global Scales
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2002; 85(7): 1863 - 1868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.