| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Clinical and Population Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
2 Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
3 Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
4 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
The objective of this study was to determine if milk samples, as they are routinely collected by Ontario Dairy Herd Improvement, would yield accurate milk urea results with an infrared assay. This investigation involved analytic validation of the infrared assay and assessment of the effect of DHI routine sample acquisition factors on milk urea results.
Analytic validation of an automated milk urea assay was performed by assessing the relative accuracy and precision of milk urea results produced by the Fossomatic 4000 Milk Analyzer, an infrared method of analysis, compared with the Eurochem test, an accepted reference method. Results indicated that, when interpreted at the group level, milk urea results between the infrared method and the reference test were in good agreement. The two tests shared a similar and high level of precision.
Milk urea concentrations obtained from composite (metered) milk samples, and not quarter stripping samples, were most representive of concurrent serum urea concentrations. The addition of bronopol preservative did not result in a numerically important change in milk urea concentrations. Storage of preserved metered milk samples for up to 4 d at either room temperature or by refrigeration, or for up to 3 d by freezing, did not result in changes in milk urea concentrations.
We concluded that milk samples, as they are routinely collected and handled by DHI, are suitable for measurement of milk urea concentrations with the infrared method of analysis if data are interpreted at the group level.
Key Words: infrared milk urea assay • dairy herd improvement • sample acquisition
Submitted on June 14, 1999
Accepted on September 26, 1999
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. M. Stoop, H. Bovenhuis, and J. A. M. van Arendonk Genetic Parameters for Milk Urea Nitrogen in Relation to Milk Production Traits J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1981 - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G. Mitchell, G. W. Rogers, C. D. Dechow, J. E. Vallimont, J. B. Cooper, U. Sander-Nielsen, and J. S. Clay Milk Urea Nitrogen Concentration: Heritability and Genetic Correlations with Reproductive Performance and Disease J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4434 - 4440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. I. Nielsen, T. Larsen, M. Bjerring, and K. L. Ingvartsen Quarter Health, Milking Interval, and Sampling Time During Milking Affect the Concentration of Milk Constituents J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3186 - 3200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Nousiainen, K. J. Shingfield, and P. Huhtanen Evaluation of Milk Urea Nitrogen as a Diagnostic of Protein Feeding J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2004; 87(2): 386 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Rajala-Schultz and W. J. A. Saville Sources of Variation in Milk Urea Nitrogen in Ohio Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1653 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
