JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 82 No. 8 1791-1794
© 1999 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holden, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holden, L. A.

Comparison of Methods of In Vitro Dry Matter Digestibility for Ten Feeds

L. A. Holden 1

1 Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

The objectives were to determine if the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility was similar by using a traditional method compared to the new DAISYII system and to determine if in vitro DM digestibility was similar for sources of inoculum from two different donor cow diets, all forage or total mixed ration. Ten feeds were digested by the traditional method, the DAISYII method with same feeds in a digestion vessel, and the DAISYII method with different feeds in a digestion vessel. The study used a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments with two sources of inoculum and three methods. The study was replicated. Source of inoculum affected in vitro DM digestibility; the grass hay donor cow diet resulted in lower digestibility values in six of the 10 feeds tested. Method did not significantly affect the digestibility values, and there were no significant source by method interactions. The DAISYII method can be used to increase labor efficiency in the in vitro DM digestibility analysis, and forages and grains can be analyzed together in a single digestion vessel.

Key Words: in vitro • digestion • forages • grains

Submitted on October 9, 1998
Accepted on April 5, 1999




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Lattimer, S. R. Cooper, D. W. Freeman, and D. L. Lalman
Effect of yeast culture on in vitro fermentation of a high-concentrate or high-fiber diet using equine fecal inoculum in a Daisy II incubator
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2484 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. P. Malinowski, W. E. Pinchak, B. A. Kramp, H. Zuo, and T. J. Butler
Supplemental Irrigation and Fall Dormancy Effects on Alfalfa Productivity in a Semiarid, Subtropical Climate with a Bimodal Precipitation Pattern
Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 621 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Parish, M. A. McCann, R. H. Watson, N. N. Paiva, C. S. Hoveland, A. H. Parks, B. L. Upchurch, N. S. Hill, and J. H. Bouton
Use of nonergot alkaloid-producing endophytes for alleviating tall fescue toxicosis in stocker cattle
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2856 - 2868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. F. Mustafa, P. Seguin, D. R. Ouellet, and I. Adelye
Effects of Cultivars on Ensiling Characteristics, Chemical Composition, and Ruminal Degradability of Pea Silage
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2002; 85(12): 3411 - 3419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.