JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 82 No. 10 2094-2100
© 1999 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roland, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boor, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roland, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boor, K. J.

Effects of Fat Replacers on the Sensory Properties, Color, Melting, and Hardness of Ice Cream

Ann M. Roland 1, Lance G. Phillips 1, and Kathryn J. Boor 1

1 Northeast Dairy Food Research Center, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

We examined the effects of individual fat replacers on the physical and sensory properties of fat-free ice cream. Ice creams (le0.5% milk fat) were formulated with maltodextrin, milk protein concentrate, or polydextrose. Lactose-reduced, freeze-concentrated skim milk was used to prepare a 1.6% fat ice cream mix. Experimental mixes were formulated to maintain the sweetness intensity and freezing characteristics of a 10% fat ice cream mix. Ice creams with 10 or 0.1% fat were prepared as controls. Composition, color, hardness, and melting characteristics were measured, and descriptive sensory analysis was used to score the ice creams. Only the maltodextrin sample was as white as 10% fat ice cream, whereas the polydextrose and lactose-reduced, freeze-concentrated skim milk samples were more yellow. Except for milk protein concentrate ice cream, products containing fat replacers were less hard than 0.1% fat ice cream. Products made with fat replacers melted faster and were judged by the sensory panel to have less cream flavor than 10% fat ice cream. Although the lactose-reduced, freeze-concentrated skim milk product had the lowest level of undesirable flavors (i.e., corn syrup, milk powder, and aftertaste) relative to the products prepared with the other fat replacers, its textural characteristics were scored as the least desirable. The sensory analysis panel scored maltodextrin as best overall as a single fat replacer in fat-free ice cream. These results suggest the need for development of fat replacer blends to optimize quality of fat-free frozen desserts.

Key Words: ice cream • fat replacers • sensory

Submitted on January 25, 1999
Accepted on June 1, 1999




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. L. Cody, A. Olabi, A. G Pettingell, P. S. Tong, and J. H. Walker
Evaluation of Rice Flour for Use in Vanilla Ice Cream
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4575 - 4585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.