JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 82 No. 1 181-190
© 1999 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fernando, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Fernando, R. L.

Approaches Investigated to Correct for Preferential Treatment

M. T. Kuhn 1, A. E. Freeman 1, and R. L. Fernando 1

1 Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011

Simulated data were used to investigate the effectiveness of three approaches to correct for preferential treatment in the genetic evaluation of US dairy cattle. The methods tested included power transformations applied to the phenotypic records, fitting a random preferential treatment effect to suspect records that were defined according to magnitude of residual, and a two-group mixture model. Transformation of records with a power of 0.1 reduced bias to zero, but had a very adverse effect on ranking. Fitting a random effect for preferential treatment in the model for genetic evaluation was effective in reducing bias, given an appropriate variance for the preferential treatment effect, but records with preferential treatment were typically identified only 45 to 60% of the time. Reductions in bias brought about by the mixture model were small but were accomplished without negative effects on ranking. Although not yet ready for use in practice, results for the effect of random preferential treatment and the two-group mixture model were favorable enough to warrant further development of these methods as possible approaches to correcting for preferential treatment in genetic evaluation.

Key Words: correction • preferential treatment • dairy breeding

Submitted on May 22, 1998
Accepted on September 9, 1998




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Odegard, J. Jensen, P. Madsen, D. Gianola, G. Klemetsdal, and B. Heringstad
Detection of Mastitis in Dairy Cattle by Use of Mixture Models for Repeated Somatic Cell Scores: A Bayesian Approach via Gibbs Sampling
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3694 - 3703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.