|
|
||||||||
1 Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics, Hohenheim University, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
2 Department of Animal Science, Egerton University, PO Box 536, Njoro, Kenya
3 Instituto de Zootecnia, Av. Bandeirantes, 2419 - Caixa Postal 206, 14,030-670 - Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
4 Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
The ranking of genotypes (i.e., breeds and breed crosses) for economic performance depends on the production circumstances of the herd and the criteria for economic evaluation. In this study, the effects of evaluation criteria and production circumstance are quantified using data from the literature on six genotypes. The economic evaluation criteria measured at herd level included lifetime profit and lifetime profit expressed per day of calving interval, per day of productive lifetime, per day of total herd life, per unit of milk, and per unit of feed energy. Four production circumstances were studied; these circumstances included constraints on the output of milk and on herd use of concentrates, roughages, and both concentrates and roughages. Profit was determined based on the sale of milk, calves, cull cows, and heifers and the expenses incurred for concentrates and roughages, animal deaths, milking time, interest, and other inputs.
Results indicate that production circumstances and evaluation criteria largely influence the ranking of genotypes and, therefore, the outcome of economic comparisons. The genotype that ranks the best under a certain criteria and circumstance ranks differently when these situations are altered. In economic comparisons of genotypes aimed at offering recommendations for implementation in smallholder dairy production systems in the tropics, the choice of the evaluation criteria should be determined by the limitation or constraint that characterizes the area where the genotypes are to produce or are currently producing. For example, for situations in which feed availability is limiting, genotypes should be ranked on total profit per unit of feed energy.
Key Words: crossbreeding dairy cattle economic evaluation criteria tropics
Submitted on April 21, 1997
Accepted on April 1, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. McCarthy, B. Horan, P. Dillon, P. O'Connor, M. Rath, and L. Shalloo Economic Comparison of Divergent Strains of Holstein-Friesian Cows in Various Pasture-Based Production Systems J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1493 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Kahi, T. Oguni, Y. Sumio, and H. Hirooka Genetic relationships between growth and carcass traits and profitability in Japanese Brown cattle J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 348 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |