|
|
||||||||
1 Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia and Genetics and Behavioural Sciences, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland
2 Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.
Multiple-trait BLUP evaluations of test day records require a large number of genetic parameters. This study estimated covariances with a reduced model that included covariance functions in two dimensions (stage of lactation and herd production level) and all three yield traits. Records came from all six states in Australia, were evenly distributed across the herd production levels, but decreased with increasing lactation stage from 9693 records for the 1st mo of lactation to 4199 records for the 10th mo. Using the variance component estimation package and a bivariate animal model, 1176 genetic (co)variances and 312 environmental (co)variances were estimated for 48 traits (1, 4, 7, and 10 mo of lactation; herd production levels of <20, 20 to 22, 22 to 24, >24 kg of milk/d; and milk, fat, and protein yields). The genetic (co)variances could be predicted by a multiplicative model that included 1) a term dependent on which yields (milk, fat, or protein) were involved in the covariance, 2) the covariance functions for month of lactation and herd production level, and 3) a covariance function for the interaction between these. This model required only 27 parameters instead of the 1176 (co)variances. For the environmental (co)variances, a model was fitted that contained several additional covariance functions. This model reduced the number of parameters from 312 to 71. For the same trait at the same production level, genetic correlations between test days ranged from 0.59 to 1, and environmental correlations ranged from 0.17 to 0.48. Genetic correlations between milk and fat, milk and protein, and fat and protein were 0.38, 0.83, 0.59, respectively, and correlations between the herd production levels ranged from 0.79 to 0.97. Failure to consider herd production level in a test day model evaluation might result, for instance, in overweighting of early lactation information from high production herds compared with information coming from bulls tested across all production levels.
Key Words: production test-day models genetic parameters covariance function
Submitted on May 8, 1997
Accepted on January 7, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Soyeurt, P. Dardenne, F. Dehareng, C. Bastin, and N. Gengler Genetic Parameters of Saturated and Monounsaturated Fatty Acid Content and the Ratio of Saturated to Unsaturated Fatty Acids in Bovine Milk J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3611 - 3626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hammami, B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, C. Bastin, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler Genotype x Environment Interaction for Milk Yield in Holsteins Using Luxembourg and Tunisian Populations J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3661 - 3671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Soyeurt, F. Dehareng, P. Mayeres, C. Bertozzi, and N. Gengler Variation of {Delta}9-Desaturase Activity in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3211 - 3224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hammami, B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, A. Ben Gara, and N. Gengler Genetic Parameters for Tunisian Holsteins Using a Test-Day Random Regression Model J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2118 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Soyeurt, A. Gillon, S. Vanderick, P. Mayeres, C. Bertozzi, and N. Gengler Estimation of Heritability and Genetic Correlations for the Major Fatty Acids in Bovine Milk J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4435 - 4442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Soyeurt, F. G. Colinet, V. M.-R. Arnould, P. Dardenne, C. Bertozzi, R. Renaville, D. Portetelle, and N. Gengler Genetic Variability of Lactoferrin Content Estimated by Mid-Infrared Spectrometry in Bovine Milk J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4443 - 4450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Environmental Sensitivity in New Zealand Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1538 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Averill, R. Rekaya, and K. Weigel Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3681 - 3689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Windig, M. P. L. Calus, B. Beerda, and R. F. Veerkamp Genetic Correlations Between Milk Production and Health and Fertility Depending on Herd Environment J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1765 - 1775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Konig, G. Dietl, I. Raeder, and H. H. Swalve Genetic Relationships for Dairy Performance Between Large-Scale and Small-Scale Farm Conditions J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 4087 - 4096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gengler, G. R. Wiggans, and A. Gillon Adjustment for Heterogeneous Covariance due to Herd Milk Yield by Transformation of Test-Day Random Regressions J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2981 - 2990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Meyer and M. Kirkpatrick Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits Phil Trans R Soc B, July 29, 2005; 360(1459): 1443 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Thompson, S. Brotherstone, and I. M.S White Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters Phil Trans R Soc B, July 29, 2005; 360(1459): 1469 - 1477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. L. Calus, M. J. Carrick, R. F. Veerkamp, and M. E. Goddard Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Milk Fat Depression in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1166 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Silvestre, F. Petim-Batista, and J. Colaco Genetic Parameter Estimates of Portuguese Dairy Cows for Milk, Fat, and Protein Using a Spline Test-Day Model J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1225 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Koivula, E. A. Mantysaari, E. Negussie, and T. Serenius Genetic and Phenotypic Relationships Among Milk Yield and Somatic Cell Count Before and After Clinical Mastitis J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Hayes, M. Carrick, P. Bowman, and M. E. Goddard Genotype x Environment Interaction for Milk Production of Daughters of Australian Dairy Sires from Test-Day Records J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3736 - 3744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. L. Calus and R. F. Veerkamp Estimation of Environmental Sensitivity of Genetic Merit for Milk Production Traits Using a Random Regression Model J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3756 - 3764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bormann, G. R. Wiggans, T. Druet, and N. Gengler Within-Herd Effects of Age at Test Day and Lactation Stage on Test-Day Yields J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3765 - 3774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |