JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 81 No. 5 1262-1266
© 1998 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruegg, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hintz, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruegg, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hintz, R. L.

Effect of the Use of Bovine Somatotropin on Culling Practices in Thirty-two Dairy Herds in Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio

P. L. Ruegg 1, A. Fabellar 2, and R. L. Hintz 2

1 Monsanto Dairy Business, 2692 Blue Haven Ct., East Lansing, MI 48823
2 Monsanto Dairy Business, 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63167

Data from 5468 Holstein dairy cows in 32 herds were used to determine the effect of the use of bovine somatotropin (bST) on culling practices over a 13-mo period. After an initial herd inventory, monthly information regarding cow entry and exit from the herds was obtained by seven participating veterinarians. Culling was coded by farmers for the following reasons: low production, reproduction, somatic cell count, mastitis, sickness, dairy purposes, lameness, death, and other. In the control herds, cows were not treated with bST during the trial. Adopter herds were defined as herds that utilized supplemental bST for ge25% of the cow-days during the trial. Mean herd use of bST in adopter herds was 38.6%. No difference in the number of cows culled per cow-day at risk was detected between control and adopter herds (0.09 and 0.11%, respectively). Amount of in-herd use of bST was unrelated to culling. No significant differences were determined between adopter and control herds in the percentage of cows that were culled for any of the nine possible culling reasons. The results of this study suggest that culling patterns in herds that use bST are unaffected for at least the first year after adoption.

Key Words: culling • bovine somatotropin • dairy cow

Submitted on June 5, 1997
Accepted on January 12, 1998




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Capper, E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman
The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production
PNAS, July 15, 2008; 105(28): 9668 - 9673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.