| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802
2 York Farm Credit, Agriculture Credit Association, Chambersburg, PA 17201
3 Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC 20005
Empirical analyses of the profitability of moderate grazing are presented based on sample dairy farms in Pennsylvania and New York. Net income per cow was higher for dairy farms that employed moderate intensive grazing than for dairy farms that employed extensive grazing. Income appeared to be adequate for family living expenses, but moderate intensive grazing could not be considered a high profit system. Detailed analyses of dairy farms that employed moderate and extensive grazing in northern Pennsylvania indicated that returns to management and owner equity were higher for pasture enterprises than for corn silage or hay enterprises. Positive dairy profits were related to lower feed costs. Milk production was lower on farms that employed moderate grazing than on farms that employed extensive grazing. Logit regression analysis characterized farms that employed moderate intensive grazing as oriented toward dairy rather than toward crop production; these farms had lower culling rates and a greater dependence on milk sales as a share of total sales. The reduced use of fertilizers and chemicals suggests that moderate grazing had environmentally sustainable features.
Key Words: grazing • profitability • northeast • intensive
Submitted on April 17, 1997
Accepted on September 8, 1997
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J.E. Doll and R.D. Jackson Wisconsin farmer attitudes regarding native grass use in grazing systems Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, July 1, 2009; 64(4): 276 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. W. McDowell, Z. Dou, J. D. Toth, B. J. Cade-Menun, P. J. A. Kleinman, K. Soder, and L. Saporito A Comparison of Phosphorus Speciation and Potential Bioavailability in Feed and Feces of Different Dairy Herds Using 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 741 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Hare, H. D. Norman, and J. R. Wright Survival rates and productive herd life of dairy cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3713 - 3720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Fontaneli, L. E. Sollenberger, R. C. Littell, and C. R. Staples Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows Managed on Pasture-Based or in Freestall Barn-Feeding Systems J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1264 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Parsons, A. E. Luloff, and G. D. Hanson Can We Identify Key Characteristics Associated with Grazing-Management Dairy Systems from Survey Data? J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2748 - 2760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Tozer, F. Bargo, and L. D. Muller Economic Analyses of Feeding Systems Combining Pasture and Total Mixed Ration J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2003; 86(3): 808 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Gloy, L. W. Tauer, and W. Knoblauch Profitability of Grazing Versus Mechanical Forage Harvesting on New York Dairy Farms J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2002; 85(9): 2215 - 2222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
