Evaluation of Models for Balancing the Protein Requirements of Dairy Cows

¹ Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park 20742
² Dairy Research, Purina Mills Inc., Saint Louis, MO 63144

Most diets for dairy cattle in the US are formulated using the mathematical model developed by the National Research Council (NRC). This model is simpler than more mechanistic models and is largely empirical. Based on the research reviewed in this paper, the simpler empirical approach is recommended for routine diet formulation at the present time. Under typical conditions using feed tables for most feed descriptions, the NRC model was more accurate than the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System, and, in its present form, the model developed by Baldwin et al. (4) is too difficult to run routinely in the field. However, the more mechanistic approaches are recommended to investigate diet and animal interactions under nonstandard environmental conditions, animals, or feeds. Because the NRC model does not address many of the potential limitations of some diets or management conditions, more complex models are needed to identify why some herds appear to underperform. Mechanistic models can be used to study or explain nutritional or physiological concepts and to develop and test research hypotheses. Ultimately, it is the fundamental research in nutrition modeling that enables advances in routine diet formulation procedures. Nonetheless, models used routinely to balance diets need to be as simple and as accurate as possible.

Key Words: diet formulation • computer modeling • protein requirements • amino acid requirements

Submitted on September 22, 1997
Accepted on May 18, 1998

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Lanzas, G. A. Broderick, and D. G. Fox Improved Feed Protein Fractionation Schemes for Formulating Rations with the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4881 - 4891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. El-Kadi, K. R. McLeod, N. A. Elam, S. E. Kitts, C. C. Taylor, D. L. Harmon, B. J. Bequette, and E. S. Vanzant Nutrient net absorption across the portal-drained viscera of forage-fed beef steers: Quantitative assessment and application to a nutritional prediction model J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2277 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Lanzas, L. O. Tedeschi, S. Seo, and D. G. Fox Evaluation of Protein Fractionation Systems Used in Formulating Rations for Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 507 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. F. Kalscheur, R. L. Baldwin VI, B. P. Glenn, and R. A. Kohn Milk Production of Dairy Cows Fed Differing Concentrations of Rumen-Degraded Protein J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 249 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii A Meta-Analysis Examining the Relationship Among Dietary Factors, Dry Matter Intake, and Milk and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2184 - 2196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Scholljegerdes, P. A. Ludden, and B. W. Hess Site and extent of digestion and amino acid flow to the small intestine in beef cattle consuming limited amounts of forage J Anim Sci, April 1, 2004; 82(4): 1146 - 1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Phillips, T. L. Citron, J. S. Sage, K. A. Cummins, M. J. Cecava, and J. P. McNamara Adaptations in Body Muscle and Fat in Transition Dairy Cattle Fed Differing Amounts of Protein and Methionine Hydroxy Analog J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3634 - 3647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ruiz, L. O. Tedeschi, J. C. Marini, D. G. Fox, A. N. Pell, G. Jarvis, and J. B Russell The Effect of a Ruminal Nitrogen (N) Deficiency in Dairy Cows: Evaluation of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System Ruminal N Deficiency Adjustment J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2002; 85(11): 2986 - 2999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]