| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences (WIAS), Wageningen Agricultural University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, United Kingdom
3 Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB, United Kingdom
Many of the amino acids that are available for absorption in ruminants are derived from microbial protein that has been synthesized in the reticulorumen. This paper focuses on the prediction of the microbial protein supply and evaluates different approaches to represent mathematically the process of microbial protein synthesis. In current protein evaluation systems for ruminants, the microbial protein supply is predicted using empirical equations that relate microbial protein production to the amounts of ruminally available energy and nitrogen. In contrast, mechanistic models of rumen function endeavor to describe quantitatively the microbial protein production that is based on underlying identifiable processes. A brief description is presented of two culture techniques used to examine microbial ecosystems, namely, batch culture and chemostat culture. The mathematical equations describing these cultures are helpful in understanding key parameters of microbial production for inclusion in models, including specific growth rate, growth yield, and substrate affinity. The availability of carbohydrates is a primary determinant of microbial protein production in the rumen, and the adequacy of mathematical representations of this relationship in empirical and mechanistic models is assessed. The representation of substrate utilization for nongrowth processes and the relationship between microbial protein production and the availability of various nitrogen sources are discussed. A variable part of the synthesized microbial protein does not reach the duodenum but is degraded in the rumen, and its representation is examined. The prediction of microbial protein supply should be based on a sound representation of the underlying mechanisms, including the interactions among microbes and between microbial activity and substrate degradation.
Key Words: modeling • rumen microorganisms • microbial protein synthesis
Submitted on September 22, 1997
Accepted on March 9, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. L. Heck, H. J. F. van Valenberg, J. Dijkstra, and A. C. M. van Hooijdonk Seasonal variation in the Dutch bovine raw milk composition J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 4745 - 4755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Firkins, Z. Yu, and M. Morrison Ruminal Nitrogen Metabolism: Perspectives for Integration of Microbiology and Nutrition for Dairy J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(13_suppl): E1 - E16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Firkins, A. N. Hristov, M. B. Hall, G. A. Varga, and N. R. St-Pierre Integration of Ruminal Metabolism in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E31 - E51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Arieli, G. Adin, and I. Bruckental The Effect of Protein Intake on Performance of Cows in Hot Environmental Temperatures J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2004; 87(3): 620 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
