| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, United Kingdom
2 Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, United Kingdom
Effects of weeks in milk and milk yield on diet choice were recorded during the first half of lactation. Low and high protein feeds were used, and both consisted of 30% concentrate and 70% grass silage (fresh matter basis). Both feeds contained similar amounts of energy, but the crude protein contents were 131 and 185 g/kg of dry matter (DM), respectively, for the low and high protein feeds. In a nutrient flow experiment with three cannulated lactating cows, the metabolizable protein yields of the low and high protein feeds were 75 and 114 g/kg of DM, respectively. Thirty-seven cows were divided into control groups for the low and high protein feeds, and a choice group had access to both the low and the high protein feeds. Intake of DM and milk yield by cows in the control group fed the high protein feed were higher than those by cows in the control group fed the low protein feed, but these measurements did not differ from those of cows in the choice group. Cows in the choice group consumed a mean of 683 g of high protein feed/kg of total intake, which differed from what would be considered random intake (500 g/kg total intake). Diet choice did not systematically change during the experiment and was not correlated with weeks in milk, milk yield, or milk protein output. We concluded that diet selection differed significantly from what would be considered random, which allowed cows in the choice group to perform well. However, diet choice did not reflect the estimated metabolizable protein requirements of the cows.
Key Words: cows • diet selection • protein • lactation
Submitted on January 28, 1998
Accepted on June 15, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. A. Gonzalez, B. J. Tolkamp, M. P. Coffey, A. Ferret, and I. Kyriazakis Changes in Feeding Behavior as Possible Indicators for the Automatic Monitoring of Health Disorders in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1017 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. J. Smit, S. Tamminga, and A. Elgersma Dairy Cattle Grazing Preference among Six Cultivars of Perennial Ryegrass Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1213 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Allcroft and C. A. Glasbey A simulation-based method for model evaluation Statistical Modeling, April 1, 2003; 3(1): 1 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Martin and D. Sauvant Metaanalysis of Input/Output Kinetics in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2002; 85(12): 3363 - 3381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Yeates, B. J. Tolkamp, and I. Kyriazakis The relationship between meal composition and long-term diet choice J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3165 - 3178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
