|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
The effects of choice of diets on feed intake were studied using 12 lactating Holstein cows. A switchback design was used that had three periods and two sequential blocks. Diets were 1) a control total mixed ration (TMR), which consisted of alfalfa haylage, corn silage, and a concentrate mixture based on ground corn and soybean meal (25:25:50 on a dry matter basis) and 2) a sweetened TMR in which a brown sugar food product constituted 1.5% of the dietary dry matter. Treatments consisted of the control TMR fed on both sides of divided feed bunks, the sweetened TMR fed on both sides of divided feed bunks, or both TMR fed on alternating (daily) sides of divided feed bunks in tie stalls. Periods were 2 wk in duration, and cows averaged 67 and 53 d of lactation at the start of blocks 1 and 2, respectively. The dry matter intake, body weight, milk yield, and percentages of milk fat, protein, and solids not fat were similar when either TMR was fed alone. A choice of control TMR or sweetened TMR did not affect any of these variables. The dry matter intake, body weight, milk yield, and milk protein percentage were affected by block; however, these effects were probably caused by differences between the blocks in environment and stage of lactation. The results of this experiment might have been affected by the composition of the control TMR, its similarity to the sweetened TMR, availability of both diets simultaneously when a choice was offered, and use of a TMR instead of separate feeds or simpler mixtures.
Key Words: variety feed intake lactation diet
Submitted on May 3, 1996
Accepted on November 12, 1996
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Firkins, B. S. Oldick, J. Pantoja, C. Reveneau, L. E. Gilligan, and L. Carver Efficacy of Liquid Feeds Varying in Concentration and Composition of Fat, Nonprotein Nitrogen, and Nonfiber Carbohydrates for Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1969 - 1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Thomas, T. C. Wright, A. Formusiak, J. P. Cant, and V. R. Osborne Use of Flavored Drinking Water in Calves and Lactating Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3831 - 3837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. McMeniman, J. D. Rivera, P. Schlegel, W. Rounds, and M. L. Galyean Effects of an artificial sweetener on health, performance, and dietary preference of feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2491 - 2500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sporndly and T. Asberg Eating rate and preference of different concentrate components for cattle. J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2188 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Broderick and W. J. Radloff Effect of Molasses Supplementation on the Production of Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Diets Based on Alfalfa and Corn Silage J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 2997 - 3009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Shah, E. J. Friedman, A. O. Bahaa, and M. R. Murphy Effect of Liquid Flavor Supplementation of the Diet on Dairy Cows in the Transition Period J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1872 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |