JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 80 No. 12 3114-3122
© 1997 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hekmat, S.
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hekmat, S.
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, D. J.

Manufacture and Quality of Iron-Fortified Yogurt

Sharareh Hekmat 1 and Donald J. McMahon 1

1 Western Dairy Center, Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Utah State University, Logan 84322-8700

Yogurts (nonfat and low fat) were manufactured and fortified with 10, 20, and 40 mg of iron/kg of yogurt. Growth of starter culture bacteria and non-starter culture bacteria as well as lipid oxidation of the yogurts were monitored over 30 d of storage at 4°C. Sensory characteristics of the yogurts were determined during that time by a trained panel of judges, and consumer panels were used to test acceptability of iron-fortified yogurt.

Counts of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus after 1 d of storage in iron-fortified skim yogurts were 7.0 x 108 cfu/ml, which were not significantly different from numbers in unfortified yogurts. Counts decreased to 2.5 x 108 and 1.9 x 108 cfu/ml for L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and S. thermophilus, respectively, after 30 d of storage. Fortifying yogurt with iron did not support the growth of Pseudomonas flurescens or Escherichia coli.

No significant increases in chemical oxidation, as measured using the thiobarbituric acid assay, were detected as a consequence of iron fortification. Trained panelists scored all yogurts for oxidized, metallic, bitter, and other off-flavors in the range of "not perceptible" to "very slightly perceptible". Iron-fortified yogurts had slightly higher oxidized flavor scores than did the control yogurt. There was no increase in metallic, bitter, or other off-flavors. The consumer panel did not detect any significant differences in the appearance, mouthfeel, flavor, or overall quality between fortified and unfortified flavored yogurts. All yogurt samples were liked by the consumer panelists, suggesting that yogurt is a suitable vehicle for iron fortification.

Key Words: yogurt • iron • fortified • oxidation

Submitted on June 24, 1996
Accepted on July 9, 1997




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Isleten and Y. Karagul-Yuceer
Effects of dried dairy ingredients on physical and sensory properties of nonfat yogurt.
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 2865 - 2872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.