Modeling Ruminal pH Fluctuations: Interactions Between Meal Frequency and Digestion Rate

¹ Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
² Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

A steady periodic analysis of ruminal carbohydrate digestion was developed to predict the effects of diet and frequency of eating on ruminal pH fluctuation. Tests of the model against previous data showed that pH fluctuations were too large when previously published rates of carbohydrate digestion were used but were improved using rates from an in vitro gas production system, which were lower. With the original digestion rates, the minimum meal frequency to maintain steady-state conditions in the rumen increased from 4 to 12 meals/d as dietary effective neutral detergent fiber (NDF) decreased from 34 to 6% of dry matter (DM); with the revised rates, the minimum frequency was 3 to 6 meals/d, respectively. The minimum effective NDF to maintain a pH value above 6.0 increased from 14 to 23% of DM as meal frequency decreased from steady state to 2 meals/d using the original rates; with the revised rates, the minimum effective NDF was slightly smaller, increasing from 13 to 21% of DM, respectively. Effects of DM intake and body weight on pH fluctuation were minor, and dietary buffers, when used at rates less than 1%, did not reduce fluctuation. Different methods of calculating mean ruminal pH yielded different results for the effect of meal frequency on mean pH.

Key Words: ruminal pH • effective fiber • meal frequency • dietary buffers

Submitted on May 21, 1996
Accepted on April 8, 1997

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin Increasing physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets through forage proportion versus forage chop length: Chewing and ruminal pH J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1603 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. DiLorenzo, C. R. Dahlen, F. Diez-Gonzalez, G. C. Lamb, J. E. Larson, and A. DiCostanzo Effects of feeding polyclonal antibody preparations on rumen fermentation patterns, performance, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3023 - 3032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Zebeli, J. Dijkstra, M. Tafaj, H. Steingass, B. N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner Modeling the Adequacy of Dietary Fiber in Dairy Cows Based on the Responses of Ruminal pH and Milk Fat Production to Composition of the Diet J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2046 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Gregorini, S. A. Gunter, and P. A. Beck Matching plant and animal processes to alter nutrient supply in strip-grazed cattle: Timing of herbage and fasting allocation J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 1006 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Robles, L. A. Gonzalez, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, and S. Calsamiglia Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2538 - 2547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rotger, A. Ferret, S. Calsamiglia, and X. Manteca Effects of nonstructural carbohydrates and protein sources on intake, apparent total tract digestibility, and ruminal metabolism in vivo and in vitro with high-concentrate beef cattle diets J Anim Sci, May 1, 2006; 84(5): 1188 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rotger, A. Ferret, S. Calsamiglia, and X. Manteca Changes in ruminal fermentation and protein degradation in growing Holstein heifers from 80 to 250 kg fed high-concentrate diets with different forage-to-concentrate ratios J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1616 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Imamidoost and J. P. Cant Non-steady-state modeling of effects of timing and level of concentrate supplementation on ruminal pH and forage intake in high-producing, grazing ewes J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 1102 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]