JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 79 No. 8 1496-1502
© 1996 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weimer, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weimer, P. J.

Why Don't Ruminal Bacteria Digest Cellulose Faster?

Paul J. Weimer 1

1 US Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, and Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706

The bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminococcus albus generally are regarded as the predominant cellulolytic microbes in the rumen. Comparison of available data from the literature reveals that these bacteria are the most actively cellulolytic of all mesophilic organisms described to date from any habitat. In light of numerous proposals to improve microbial cellulose digestion in ruminants, it is instructive to examine the characteristics of these species that contribute to their superior cellulolytic capabilities and to identify the factors that prevent them from digesting cellulose even more rapidly. As a group, these species have extreme nutritional specialization. They are able to utilize cellulose (or in some cases xylan) and its hydrolytic products as their nearly sole energy sources for growth. Moreover, each species apparently has evolved to similar maximum rates of cellulose digestion (first-order rate constants of 0.05 to 0.08 h–l). Active cellulose digestion involves adherence of cells to the fibers via a glycoprotein glycocalyx, which protects cells from protozoal grazing and cellulolytic enzymes from degradation by ruminal proteases while it retains—at least temporarily—the cellodextrin products for use by the cellulolytic bacteria. These properties result in different ecological roles for the adherent and nonadherent populations of each species, but overall provide an enormous selective advantage to these cellulolytic bacteria in the ruminal environment. However, major constraints to cellulose digestion are caused by cell-wall structure of the plant (matrix interactions among wall biopolymers and low substrate surface area) and by limited penetration of the nonmotile cellulolytic microbes into the cell lumen. Because of these constraints and the highly adapted nature of cellulose digestion by the predominant cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen, transfer of cellulolytic capabilities to noncellulolytic ruminal bacteria (e.g., by genetic engineering) that display other desirable properties offers limited opportunities to improve ruminal digestion of cellulose.

Key Words: rumen • digestion • cellulolytic microbes • fiber

Submitted on June 27, 1995
Accepted on March 26, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
W. C. Ellis, M. Mahlooji, and J. H. Matis
Models for estimating parameters of neutral detergent fiber digestion by ruminal microorganisms
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1591 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
W. C. Ellis, M. Mahlooji, C. E. Lascano, and J. H. Matis
Effects of size of ingestively masticated fragments of plant tissues on kinetics of digestion of NDF
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1602 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
Z. G. Weinberg, Y. Chen, and M. Gamburg
The Passage of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Silage into Rumen Fluid, In Vitro Studies
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3386 - 3397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
J. S. Van Kessel, P. C. Nedoluha, A. Williams-Campbell, R. L. Baldwin VI, and K. R. McLeod
Effects of ruminal and postruminal infusion of starch hydrolysate or glucose on the microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract in growing steers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 3027 - 3034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
L. R. Lynd, P. J. Weimer, W. H. van Zyl, and I. S. Pretorius
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 66(3): 506 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Crop Sci.Home page
H. G. Jung and F. M. Engels
Alfalfa Stem Tissues: Cell Wall Deposition, Composition, and Degradability
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 524 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
D. O. Krause, R. J. Bunch, L. L. Conlan, P. M. Kennedy, W. J. Smith, R. I. Mackie, and C. S. McSweeney
Repeated ruminal dosing of Ruminococcus spp. does not result in persistence, but changes in other microbial populations occur that can be measured with quantitative 16S-rRNA-based probes
Microbiology, July 1, 2001; 147(7): 1719 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MicrobiologyHome page
S. R. MacLellan and C. W. Forsberg
Properties of the major non-specific endonuclease from the strict anaerobe Fibrobacter succinogenes and evidence for disulfide bond formation in vivo
Microbiology, February 1, 2001; 147(2): 315 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.