JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 79 No. 8 1487-1495
© 1996 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, J. B.

Why Do Many Ruminal Bacteria Die and Lyse So Quickly?

James E. Wells 1 and James B. Russell 2

1 Section of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 and Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
2 Section of Microbiology, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

Studies using 15N have indicated that as much as 50% of the microbial mass turns over before N passes to the lower gut, and this N recycling significantly decreases the availability of microbial protein. Protozoa digest bacteria and smaller protozoa, but bacterial protein can turn over even if protozoa are not present. Fibrobacter succinogenes cultures lyse even when they are growing, and the lysis rate is independent of growth rate. When extracellular sugar is depleted, F. succinogenes secretes an extracellular proteinase that inactivates the autolysins. This method of autolytic regulation decreases the turnover of stationary cells. Bacteriophage and anaeroplasma can cause lysogeny, but, as yet, there is little proof that these processes are important determinants of bacterial turnover in vivo. Dietary manipulations (e.g., salt feeding and particle size reduction) that increase liquid and solid dilution rates can increase bacterial flow by decreasing bacterial residence time and turnover. Some dead ruminal bacteria are able to maintain their cellular integrity, and the ratio of dead to live cells in ruminal fluid may be as great as 10:1. Bacterial survival appears to be at least partially explained by the method of sugar transport. When bacteria rely solely on mechanisms of ion-coupled sugar symport, an energized membrane is necessary for the reinitiation of growth. If group translocation (phosphotransferase system) is the mechanisms of transport., uptake can be driven by phosphoenolpyruvate, and an energized membrane and the storage of intracellular reserve materials are not an absolute criteria for survival. In some cases, N deprivation accelerates death. When Prevotella ruminicola was limited for N under conditions of excess energy, methylglyoxal production caused a rapid decrease in viability. The impact of bacterial death in the rumen is not clear-cut. If the rate of fermentation is zero-order with respect to cell concentration (substrate-limited), cell death would have little impact on digestion.

Key Words: rumen • bacteria • death • lysis

Submitted on June 27, 1995
Accepted on March 22, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Voelker Linton and M. S. Allen
Nutrient demand interacts with forage family to affect nitrogen digestion and utilization responses in dairy cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1594 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Dohme, T. J. DeVries, and K. A. Beauchemin
Repeated Ruminal Acidosis Challenges in Lactating Dairy Cows at High and Low Risk for Developing Acidosis: Ruminal pH
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3554 - 3567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. C. Taylor and M. S. Allen
Corn Grain Endosperm Type and Brown Midrib 3 Corn Silage: Ruminal Fermentation and N Partitioning in Lactating Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1434 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. A. Broderick, P. Uden, M. L. Murphy, and A. Lapins
Sources of Variation in Rates of in Vitro Ruminal Protein Degradation
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1345 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Voelker and M. S. Allen
Pelleted Beet Pulp Substituted for High-Moisture Corn: 3. Effects on Ruminal Fermentation, pH, and Microbial Protein Efficiency in Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3562 - 3570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
K. Lewis
Programmed Death in Bacteria
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 64(3): 503 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
D. R. Bond, B. M. Tsai, and J. B. Russell
Physiological characterization of Streptococcus bovis mutants that can resist 2-deoxyglucose-induced lysis
Microbiology, October 1, 1999; 145(10): 2977 - 2985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.