JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 79 No. 2 329-333
© 1996 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rushing, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rushing, J. E.

Procedures Used by North Carolina Dairies for Vitamins A and D Fortification of Milk

Tammy Hicks 1, A. P. Hansen 1, and J. E. Rushing 1

1 North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695

New research findings have documented fortification errors in fortified milk products all across the US milk industry. Also, the consumption of overfortified bovine milk has led the public to question whether vitamin fortification is safe. Therefore, North Carolina dairies were surveyed to determined vitamin fortification procedures used and to determine differences among these procedures. Of the parameters surveyed, the general conditions under which vitamin preparations were stored, the method used to add vitamin preparations to milk, and the point during processing at which vitamin preparations were added to milk were different among dairies. Forty-six percent of the dairies stored vitamin preparations under refrigerated conditions, and 54% stored vitamin preparations at ambient temperatures. The addition of vitamin preparations to bovine milk was accomplished by metered injection at 64% of the dairies and batch addition techniques at 36%. Vitamin preparations were added before fat content standardization and separation by 23% of the dairy processors; 77% added the vitamin preparations after this point. When dairies were asked at what point they added their vitamin preparations to the milk, nine different answers were given. Although other sources of error could also contributed to inconsistent concentrations of vitamin fortification, differences in fortification procedures may have a large impact upon the problem. The diversity of vitamin fortification practices used in North Carolina may be an indication of nationwide trends.

Key Words: milk • vitamins • fortification procedures

Submitted on October 17, 1994
Accepted on October 5, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. Misra, D. Pacaud, A. Petryk, P. F. Collett-Solberg, M. Kappy, and on behalf of the Drug and Therapeutics Committee o
Vitamin D Deficiency in Children and Its Management: Review of Current Knowledge and Recommendations
Pediatrics, August 1, 2008; 122(2): 398 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. J. Rovner and K. O. O'Brien
Hypovitaminosis D Among Healthy Children in the United States: A Review of the Current Evidence
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2008; 162(6): 513 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. S Calvo, S. J Whiting, and C. N Barton
Vitamin D fortification in the United States and Canada: current status and data needs
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2004; 80(6): 1710S - 1716S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.