JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 79 No. 11 2056-2070
© 1996 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, J.C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnside, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, J.C.M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnside, E. B.

Optimal Size of Progeny Groups for Progeny-Testing Programs by Artificial Insemination Firms

J.C.M. Dekkers 1, G. E. Vandervoort 1, and E. B. Burnside 1

1 Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph. ON, Canada N1G 2W1

A semi-stochastic model for the simulation of genetic improvement in a dairy cattle population was used to evaluate and optimize progeny-testing programs for AI firms that operate in a competitive market for semen from progeny-tested bulls with regard to number of bulls sampled and size of progeny groups. The population was serviced by four firms. The competition for market share and semen sales was determined by the relative rank of progeny-tested bulls from a firm based on EBV for a trait with a heritability of 25%. For a fixed total number of daughters from young bulls for an AI program (test capacity), optimal size of the progeny groups was highly dependent on the objective to be maximized. The rate of genetic gain was maximized with a progeny group of 57 to 61 daughters per bull, but was relatively robust to changes in size of progeny groups. The number of marketable bulls was maximized with progeny groups between 20 and 40 daughters, depending on the test capacity. However, when a relationship between price per dose of semen and EBV of marketable bulls was considered, returns from semen sales were maximized at 49 and 82 daughters per bull, respectively, for linear and quadratic functions for semen price. The critical objective, net returns from semen sales, subtracting costs of sampling bulls, was maximized for progeny groups of between 95 and 105 daughters. Optimal size of progeny groups was robust to changes in economic parameters and the breeding programs of competitors. For economic parameters that were typical for Canadian AI firms, net returns per annual cohort of young bulls were 40% higher for the optimal size of the progeny groups than for sampling with 60 daughters per bull.

Key Words: progeny-testing • genetics • artificial insemination • economics

Submitted on January 3, 1996
Accepted on May 20, 1996




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, X. L. Wu, D. Gianola, B. Heringstad, and H. Simianer
Exploration of Relationships Between Claw Disorders and Milk Yield in Holstein Cows via Recursive Linear and Threshold Models
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 395 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, S. Lessner, and H. Simianer
Application of Controlling Instruments for Improvements in Cow Sire Selection
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1967 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
O. Gonzalez-Recio, C. Ugarte, and R. Alenda
Genetic Analysis of an Artificial Insemination Progeny Test Program
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 783 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.