JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 9 2067-2072
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, A. E.

Biases in Predicted Transmitting Abilities of Sires When Daughters Receive Preferential Treatment

M. T. Kuhn 1 and A. E. Freeman 1

1 Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011

Data were simulated according to the USDA animal model to determine biases in sire PTA when daughters receive preferential treatment. Two scenarios were investigated.

For scenario 1, all daughters were randomly distributed across herds. Bias increased with total number of daughters but at a decreasing rate. For a given total number of daughters, bias increased linearly as the percentage of daughters receiving preferential treatment increased from 25 to 100%. Expressed as a proportion of the preferential treatment effect, bias ranged from .10 to .77.

For scenario 2, daughters receiving preferential treatment were placed in a single herd and remaining daughters that did not receive preferential treatment were randomly distributed across 378 other herds. Total number of daughters was 20, 30, or 40, and the percentage of daughters receiving preferential treatment was 50, 75, or 100% in scenario 2. Two sets of herd sizes were used. With the smaller herds, bias was zero when all daughters received preferential treatment; otherwise, bias ranged from .08 to .10. With the larger herds, biases increased as the percentage of daughters receiving preferential treatment increased. The range in bias was .10 to .18 for scenario 2 for the larger herds.

Key Words: predicted transmitting ability • preferential treatment • bias • daughters

Submitted on February 10, 1995
Accepted on May 1, 1995







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.