JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 9 1962-1969
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Glenn, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, J. B., III
Right arrow Articles by Glenn, B. P.

Observations on Determination of Dysprosium in Labeled Digesta Samples by Near Infrared Spectroscopy

James B. Reeves III 1 and Barbara P. Glenn 1

1 Nutrient Conservation and Metabolism Laboratory, Livestock and Poultry Sciences Institute, ARS, USDA, Building 200, Room 124, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD 20705

The objective of this work was to determine whether the Dy content of ruminal digesta samples labeled by pulsedosing intra-ruminally with Dy-labeled forages could be determined by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Ruminal grab samples were obtained from four steers. Equal numbers of alfalfa and orchardgrass samples were collected at 17 times (0 to 165 h) after dosing and analyzed (total of 272 samples). Dysprosium was determined by direct current plasma emission spectrometry. Spectra were obtained by scanning ground samples on a scanning monochromator. Calibrations for Dy (0 to 349.5 ppm; mean = 44.5 ppm) were carried out using both step-wise and partial least squares regressions. Wavelength selections using step-wise regression included characteristic Dy wavelengths and resulted in R2 and standard error of analysis of sim.9 and ge20 ppm, respectively. Partial least squares regressions, although more robust, were not significantly better. Sample ashing to increase relative Dy concentrations did not improve the results. Further investigations indicated that interference by Co marker, also present in the samples, was a problem. Although near infrared reflectance spectroscopy is capable of determining Dy in labeled forages, further work is needed to increase its accuracy.

Key Words: near infrared • dysprosium forages • in situ

Submitted on January 9, 1995
Accepted on May 12, 1995







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.