JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 7 1591-1596
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Albuquerque, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Vleck, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Albuquerque, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Vleck, L. D.

Estimates Using an Animal Model of (Co)variances for Yields of Milk, Fat, and Protein for the First Lactation of Holstein Cows in California and New York

L. G. Albuquerque 1, G. Dimov 1, J. F. Keown 1, and L. D. Van Vleck 2

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908
2 Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, A218 Animal Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

First lactation yields of milk, fat, and protein from Holstein cows in New York and California were used to obtain REML estimates of (co)variances for yield traits using a multitrait animal model. Data from each state were split randomly into 10 samples, averaging 5504 cows per sample from California and 5078 from New York. Mean heritability estimates for milk, fat, and protein yields were .30 ± .02, .31 ± .01, and .29 ± .01 for California data and .33 ± .01, .35 ± .01, and .30 ± .01 for New York data. Averages of genetic correlation estimates for California and New York were .63 ± .01 and .52 ± .02 between milk and fat, .84 ± .01 and .83 ± .01 between milk and protein, and .73 ± .01 and .68 ± .01 between fat and protein. Estimates of environmental correlations were larger than estimates of genetic correlations. Mean estimates of phenotypic correlations for California and New York were .75 ± .01 and .72 ± .01 between milk and fat, .92 ± .01 and .91 ± .01 between milk and protein, and .81 ± .01 and .79 ± .01 between fat and protein yields. On average, these estimates agree with those obtained from animal models with limited rounds of iteration for small data files.

Key Words: genetic parameters • yield traits • Holsteins

Submitted on December 5, 1994
Accepted on March 13, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, G. Dietl, I. Raeder, and H. H. Swalve
Genetic Relationships for Dairy Performance Between Large-Scale and Small-Scale Farm Conditions
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 4087 - 4096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
A. Molenaar, J. Mao, K. Oden, and H.-M. Seyfert
All Three Promoters of the Acetyl-Coenzyme A-Carboxylase {alpha}-encoding Gene Are Expressed in Mammary Epithelial Cells of Ruminants
J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2003; 51(8): 1073 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.