JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 3 678-692
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Tassell, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Tassell, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, E. J.

Effects of Selection on Estimates of Variance Components Using Gibbs Sampling and Restricted Maximum Likelihood

C. P. Van Tassell 1, G. Casella 2, and E. J. Pollak 1

1 Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
2 Biometrics Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

The effect of selection on estimates of variance components using Gibbs sampling mean and mode, REML, and minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation was examined through simulation. One hundred replicates were generated for 27 combinations of three levels each of selection schemes, population structures, and heritabilities. All populations consisted of 400 animals. All methods were empirically unbiased, except for the Gibbs sampling estimate of the mode for small variance components, for which the posterior distribution was skewed. Mean squared errors decreased for Gibbs sampling and REML estimates when data were selected, but mean squared errors increased with selection and were largest for minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation. No pattern existed for differences in mean squared errors for randomly mated and unselected data, suggesting that the differences were due to the direct effect of selection rather than to changes in population structure. Based on these results, the use of minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation of variance components may be less accurate than other methods for potentially selected field data. Advantages of Gibbs sampling to estimate variance components include simple programming of the Gibbs sampling algorithm and easy calculation of variance of estimates and confidence intervals.

Key Words: Gibbs sampling • restricted maximum likelihood • selection • variance components

Submitted on May 27, 1994
Accepted on September 19, 1994




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. B. C. H. M. van Kaam, M. C. A. M. Bink, D. O. Maizon, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and R. L. Quaas
Bayesian reanalysis of a quantitative trait locus accounting for multiple environments by scaling in broilers
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2009 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H.-P. Piepho and J. Mohring
Selection in Cultivar Trials--Is It Ignorable?
Crop Sci., December 2, 2005; 46(1): 192 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.