JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 12 2858-2870
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reents, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reents, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffer, L. R.

Genetic Evaluation for Somatic Cell Score with a Test Day Model for Multiple Lactations

R. Reents 1, J.C.M. Dekkers 1, and L. R. Schaeffer 1

1 Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

A multiple lactation model for test day data was applied to predict genetic merit for somatic cell scores of Canadian Holsteins. The model for genetic evaluation included a fixed effect for herd test date, fixed regressions on functions of days of lactation, random effects of permanent environment within lactation, random genetic effects of animal, and residual effects. Records from the first three lactations were used and treated as different traits. Procedures for this model, developed for national genetic evaluation for somatic cell score in Canada, were found to be practical. Use of starting values from the previous genetic evaluation reduced the number of rounds necessary to reach convergence. Test day models were compared with several single-trait models based on lactation average of somatic cell score in terms of computing efficiency and ranking of animals. Differences between EBV from the test day model and EBV from a repeatability model for lactation average were small for bulls with many daughters, but differences were large with EBV from a single-trait model for first lactation average of somatic cell count. Associations were desirable for EBV for somatic cell score with EBV for some udder conformation traits, but undesirable for EBV for milk and protein yield.

Key Words: test day model • multiple lactation model • somatic cell score • genetic evaluation

Submitted on April 3, 1995
Accepted on August 21, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
I. Goertz, C. Baes, C. Weimann, N. Reinsch, and G. Erhardt
Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CXCR1 gene and somatic cell score in Holstein dairy cattle
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 4018 - 4022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Caccamo, R. F. Veerkamp, G. de Jong, M. H. Pool, R. Petriglieri, and G. Licitra
Variance Components for Test-Day Milk, Fat, and Protein Yield, and Somatic Cell Score for Analyzing Management Information
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3268 - 3276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Vasconcelos, F. Santos, A. Bagnato, and J. Carvalheira
Effects of Clustering Herds with Small-Sized Contemporary Groups in Dairy Cattle Genetic Evaluations
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 377 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. R. Zwald, K. A. Weigel, Y. M. Chang, R. D. Welper, and J. S. Clay
Genetic Analysis of Clinical Mastitis Data from On-Farm Management Software Using Threshold Models
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 330 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. M. Sawalha, J. F. Keown, S. D. Kachman, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle with Test-Day Models with Autoregressive Covariance Structures and with a 305-d Model
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3346 - 3353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Moroni, G. Pisoni, M. Antonini, G. Ruffo, S. Carli, G. Varisco, and P. Boettcher
Subclinical Mastitis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus caprae and Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolated from Two Italian Goat Herds
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(5): 1694 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt, A. Bunger, and R. Reents
Derivation and Calculation of Approximate Reliabilities and Daughter Yield-Deviations of a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1896 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Mayeres, J. Stoll, J. Bormann, R. Reents, and N. Gengler
Prediction of Daily Milk, Fat, and Protein Production by a Random Regression Test-Day Model
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1925 - 1933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. I. Weller and E. Ezra
Genetic Analysis of the Israeli Holstein Dairy Cattle Population for Production and Nonproduction Traits with a Multitrait Animal Model
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1519 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. C. Wagter, B. A. Mallard, B. N. Wilkie, K. E. Leslie, P. J. Boettcher, and J. C. M. Dekkers
The Relationship Between Milk Production and Antibody Response to Ovalbumin During the Peripartum Period
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2003; 86(1): 169 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.