JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 12 2847-2857
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reents, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, J.C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reents, R.
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, J.C.M.

Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Test Day Records of Somatic Cell Score

R. Reents 1, J. Jamrozik 1, L. R. Schaeffer 1, and J.C.M. Dekkers 1

1 Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

The present study estimated variance components for test day records of somatic cell score and production traits. Data consisted of 235,100 test day observations recorded between 1986 and 1994 on lactations 1 to 3 of 15,922 Holstein cows from 143 herds. Records were considered as repeated observations within a lactation and as different traits across lactations. The multiple-trait animal model for analysis included random animal additive genetic and permanent environment effects by lactation. Fixed effects included herd test date and a set of four covariables for days in lactation, estimated by parity, age, and season, which accounted for the shape of the lactation curve. Gibbs sampling chains were carried out separately for somatic cell score and milk production and fat and protein yields. Heritabilities of somatic cell score for lactations l to 3 were .09, .09, and . 11, respectively. Genetic correlations between lactations were high (.88, .79, and .95 between lactations 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3, respectively). Correlations between permanent environment effects were smaller (.29, .19, and .46 between lactations 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3, respectively). Heritabilities and correlations between permanent environment effects were higher for production traits than for somatic cell score. Genetic correlations between lactations for production traits were similar to those for somatic cell score. Variances between lactations differed significantly, indicating that observations from different lactations should not be considered as repeated observations of the same trait.

Key Words: somatic cell count • test day models • Gibbs sampling • genetic parameters

Submitted on April 3, 1995
Accepted on August 21, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Kramer, E. Stamer, J. Spilke, G. Thaller, and J. Krieter
Analysis of water intake and dry matter intake using different lactation curve models
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 4072 - 4081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. P. Sorensen, T. Mark, P. Madsen, and M. S. Lund
Genetic correlations between pathogen-specific mastitis and somatic cell count in Danish Holsteins
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3457 - 3471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. B. Cole, D. J. Null, and P. M. VanRaden
Best prediction of yields for long lactations
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1796 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Y. de Haas, W. Ouweltjes, J. t. Napel, J. J. Windig, and G. de Jong
Alternative Somatic Cell Count Traits as Mastitis Indicators for Genetic Selection
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2501 - 2511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. Hammami, B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, A. Ben Gara, and N. Gengler
Genetic Parameters for Tunisian Holsteins Using a Test-Day Random Regression Model
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2118 - 2126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. J. Boettcher, D. Caraviello, and D. Gianola
Genetic Analysis of Somatic Cell Scores in US Holsteins with a Bayesian Mixture Model
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 435 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. J. Nauta, R. F. Veerkamp, E. W. Brascamp, and H. Bovenhuis
Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2729 - 2737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Hinrichs, E. Stamer, W. Junge, and E. Kalm
Genetic Analyses of Mastitis Data Using Animal Threshold Models and Genetic Correlation with Production Traits
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2260 - 2268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Szyda, Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt, and R. Reents
Estimation of Quantitative Trait Loci Parameters for Milk Production Traits in German Holstein Dairy Cattle Population
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 356 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Carlen, E. Strandberg, and A. Roth
Genetic Parameters for Clinical Mastitis, Somatic Cell Score, and Production in the First Three Lactations of Swedish Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 3062 - 3070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Norberg, G. W. Rogers, R. C. Goodling, J. B. Cooper, and P. Madsen
Genetic Parameters for Test-Day Electrical Conductivity of Milk for First-Lactation Cows from Random Regression Models
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1917 - 1924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Norberg, H. Hogeveen, I. R. Korsgaard, N. C. Friggens, K. H. M. N. Sloth, and P. Lovendahl
Electrical Conductivity of Milk: Ability to Predict Mastitis Status
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2004; 87(4): 1099 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Bennewitz, N. Reinsch, S. Paul, C. Looft, B. Kaupe, C. Weimann, G. Erhardt, G. Thaller, Ch. Kuhn, M. Schwerin, et al.
The DGAT1 K232A Mutation Is Not Solely Responsible for the Milk Production Quantitative Trait Locus on the Bovine Chromosome 14
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2004; 87(2): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.