JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 11 2486-2495
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nash, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nash, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, G. W.

Herd Sire Portfolio Selection: A Comparison of Rounded Linear and Integer Programming

D. L. Nash 1 and G. W. Rogers 1

1 Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

Use of linear programming to select portfolios of herd sires can result in solutions containing noninteger units per bull. Because semen cannot be purchased in partial units, two alternatives were investigated: integer programming and rounded linear programming. Expected net revenue based on PTA dollars for milk, fat, and protein; udder depth; teat placement; foot angle; and semen price were calculated for 383 Holstein bulls. Maximization of expected net revenue was subject to constraints: required lots of 5 units, maximum average price per lot, minimum and maximum lots per bull, minimum average reliability, minimum number of lots from bulls that transmit calving ease, and minimum number of bulls. Multiple formulations were used for expected net revenue and constraint combinations. Eighteen of 36 linear programming portfolios contained noninteger lots per bull. Five rounded linear programming portfolios were identical to their respective integer programming portfolios. Differences in lots per bull between the remaining 13 pairs of portfolios were small. Linear programming portfolios that were unconstrained by semen price tended to be integer. Six of 18 rounded linear programming portfolios did not stay within bounds set by constraints. For the model used, integer programming did not offer a significant advantage over rounded linear programming.

Key Words: sire selection • linear programming • integer programming • portfolio

Submitted on June 6, 1994
Accepted on June 2, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. B. McConnel and D. T. Galligan
The Use of Integer Programming to Select Bulls Across Breeding Companies with Volume Price Discounts
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3542 - 3549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.