JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 78 No. 10 2308-2313
© 1995 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Domecq, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaneene, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Domecq, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaneene, J. B.

Validation of Body Condition Scores with Ultrasound Measurements of Subcutaneous Fat of Dairy Cows

J. J. Domecq 1, A. L. Skidmore 1, J. W. Lloyd 2, and J. B. Kaneene 2

1 Department of Animal Science
2 Population Medicine Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48825

This research validated body condition scores with ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat. Fifty Holstein cows were evaluated during three sessions in 1993. Cows scored during each session were divided into three groups of 15 or 20 cows. Body condition scores were assigned by one trained individual, utilizing a five-point (1 = thin to 5 = fat) visual scoring technique. Cows were scored to the nearest quarter point. Ultrasound measurements of subcutaneous fat were obtained by another individual at the lumbar, thurl, and tailhead areas of both sides of the cow. Body condition scores and ultrasound measurements were collected on the same day, but obtained independently. Correlations between ultrasound measurements ranged from .36 to .86. Regression models were developed to validate the body condition scoring technique across the three cow groups. Group number and different combinations of ultrasound measurements were independent variables, and body condition score was the dependent variable. Ultrasound measurements were significantly associated with body condition scores. The coefficients of determination for the models ranged from .36 to .65, depending on which ultrasound measurements were included in the model. These results suggest that the body condition scoring technique used in this study was as valid as ultrasound techniques for measurement of subcutaneous fat.

Key Words: body condition score • ultrasound • subcutaneous fat

Submitted on January 12, 1995
Accepted on May 22, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel
Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Kokkonen, J. Taponen, T. Anttila, L. Syrjala-Qvist, C. Delavaud, Y. Chilliard, M. Tuori, and A. T. Tesfa
Effect of Body Fatness and Glucogenic Supplement on Lipid and Protein Mobilization and Plasma Leptin in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1127 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. D. Dechow, G. W. Rogers, U. Sander-Nielsen, L. Klei, T. J. Lawlor, J. S. Clay, A. E. Freeman, G. Abdel-Azim, A. Kuck, and S. Schnell
Correlations Among Body Condition Scores from Various Sources, Dairy Form, and Cow Health from the United States and Denmark
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3526 - 3533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.