JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 77 No. 4 1141-1145
© 1994 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spain, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Witherspoon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spain, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Witherspoon, M.

Why Missouri Dairy Farms Discontinue Dairy Herd Improvement Association Testing Programs

J. N. Spain 1 and Mark Witherspoon 2

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
2 Missouri DHIA, Springfield 65803

Missouri dairy producers who discontinued DHIA testing between May 1990 and July 1991 were surveyed by mail for a total of 148 herds. Forty-five complete surveys were returned. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported an average herd size between 26 and 75 cows. Participation in DHIA ranged from <1 to >20 yr. Reasons for discontinuing DHIA included poor service, cost, dispersal sale, replacement with other records, or no benefit received. Producers reporting poor service identified supervisor service or records processing center. Fifty-four percent of producers that had been on test <3 yr discontinued DHIA following dispersal sale. Producers indicated that DHIA was replaced using on-farm computers, handwritten records, or bulk tank shipped weights. When asked how records were used for management decisions, 87.5% used records for culling decisions, 55.0% used records for mastitis and nutrition management, and 42.5% used records for reproduction management. Forty percent of herds were on test <3 yr, suggesting that an opportunity exists for educational programs with new herds on DHIA. Supervisor training and performance were also factors in maintaining herds on test.

Key Words: Dairy Herd Improvement Association • survey

Submitted on September 30, 1993
Accepted on December 3, 1993







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.