JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 77 No. 3 748-758
© 1994 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Day, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Day, J. D.

Winter Evaluation of a Postmilking Powdered Teat Dip

J. J. Goldberg 1, P. A. Murdough 1, A. B. Howard 1, P. A. Drechsler 1, J. W. Pankey 1, G. A. Ledbetter 2, L. L. Day 3, and J. D. Day 3

1 Quality Milk Research Laboratory, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405
2 C Bar M Dairy, Jerome, ID 83338
3 Dairy Health Services-Mastitis Prevention Services, Jerome, ID 83338

A powdered teat dip designed for winter usage was evaluated for bacteriological efficacy and teat conditioning qualities. A positive control, natural exposure field trial was conducted for 3 mo on 509 lactating cows. Two sets of cows, primiparous and multiparous, were used. The trial compared efficacy of a powdered teat dip with a teat dip of 1% iodine plus 10% glycerin.

Bacteriological efficacy among primiparous cows was equivalent for all major mastitis pathogens, environmental pathogens, and streptococci other than Streptococcus agalactiae. Efficacy was not equivalent against coagulase-negative staphylococci and all mastitis pathogens. Results suggested that the positive control product was more efficacious.

Among multiparous cows, efficacy was equivalent against environmental mastitis pathogens and bacteriologically negative, clinical mastitis. The products were not equivalent against Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, or all major mastitis pathogens, once again suggesting that the positive control product was more efficacious. Data indicated that germicidal activity of the powdered dip was not sufficient to reduce the incidence of new IMI caused by contagious or minor pathogens normally associated with teat skin.

Application of a powdered postmilking teat dip during 3 winter mo in Idaho resulted in improved teat end condition among primiparous and multiparous dairy cows. Teat skin condition improved among primiparous but not among multiparous cows.

Key Words: teat condition • corn starch • powdered teat dip • postmilking teat sanitizer

Submitted on June 28, 1993
Accepted on October 18, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. K. Fox, C. Gradle, and A. Dee
Short communication: disinfectant containing a complex of skin conditioners.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2539 - 2541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. Boddie, W. E. Owens, C. J. Foret, and P. Janowicz
Efficacy of a 0.1% Iodine Teat Dip Against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae During Experimental Challenge
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 3089 - 3091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. M. Galton
Effects of an Automatic Postmilking Teat Dipping System on New Intramammary Infections and Iodine in Milk
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2004; 87(1): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. De Vliegher, H. Laevens, H. W. Barkema, G. Opsomer, T. Hemling, and A. de Kruif
Short-Term Effect of Transition from Conventional to Automated Milking on Teat Skin and Teat End Condition
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1646 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.