JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 77 No. 2 418-425
© 1994 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malik, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, L. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malik, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, L. T.

Extraction and Detection of Sulfamethazine in Spray-Dried Milk

Shahana Malik 1, Susan E. Duncan 1, J. Russell Bishop 2, and Larry T. Taylor 3

1 Department of Food Science and Technology
2 University of Wisconsin, Center for Dairy Research, Madison 53706
3 Department of Chemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061

Processes that reduce moisture content of fluid milk may result in a high concentration of animal drug residues that are undetectable in the fluid milk on the basis of the same weights. The objectives were to determine the amount of sulfamethazine in spray-dried milk powder manufactured from fluid milk contaminated with sulfamethazine and to determine the effectiveness of supercritical fluid extraction as a means to extract sulfamethazine from dry milk powder. Fluid whole (3.25% fat) and skim milks with sulfamethazine added at concentrations of 5, 10, and 100 ppb were spray-dried. Based on total solids, observed concentrations were 493 and 523 ppb in skim and whole dry milk powders, respectively, compared with fluid milk containing 100 ppb of sulfamethazine as determined by HPLC. The increase in sulfamethazine concentration from fluid to dry milk was also measured quantitatively by a microbial receptor assay and an ELISA. Poor recoveries and variability in data were possibly due to binding of sulfamethazine to undetermined milk components. Dry milk powder with measured concentrations of sulfamethazine was treated with supercritical CO2. Sulfamethazine was not detectable in the extracted dry milk powder by microbial receptor assay or ELISA.

Key Words: drug residues • milk powder • sulfamethazine • supercritical fluid extraction

Submitted on April 27, 1992
Accepted on August 18, 1993







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.