|
|
||||||||
1 Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hankuk Yakult Institute, 449 Wanggok-dong, Euiwang-si, Kyunggi-do, Korea
The antimicrobial susceptibility of 37 strains of bifidobacteria to 18 anti-microbial agents was determined by a macrodilution broth method. Most of the strains used were isolated from commercial yogurts and starters. Tested organisms were usually sensitive to Gram-positive spectrum antibiotics (bacitracin, erythromycin, lincomycin, and vancomycin), and most of the organisms were inhibited by a concentration 4 .5 6 µg/ml. Erythromycin was the most active agent; all strains were inhibited by <.19 µg/ml. ß-Lactam antibiotics (penicillin G, ampicillin, methicillin, and cephalothin), showing a wide range of minimum inhibitory concentration, were less effective than Gram-positive spectrum antibiotics. Most strains were somewhat resistant to cephalothin, exhibiting inhibition at concentrations of 6.25 to 25.0 µg/ml. Test organisms were most resistant to kanamycin, neomycin, paromomycin sulfate, nalidixic acid, and polymyxin B sulfate; inhibition occurred only at
50 µg/ml, and strains were somewhat less resistant to gentamicin and streptomycin. Susceptibility to nitrofurantoin and tetracycline was variable; minimum inhibitory concentrations ranged from 1.56 to 50.0 and .39 to 50.0 µg/ml, respectively, but chloramphenicol had a narrow range from 1.56 to 6.25 µg/ml.
Key Words: bifidobacteria macrodilution broth susceptibility test antimicrobial susceptibility minimum inhibitory concentration
Submitted on November 6, 1992
Accepted on March 15, 1993
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Kheadr, N. Dabour, C. Le Lay, C. Lacroix, and I. Fliss Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Bifidobacteria as Affected by Oxgall, Acid, and Hydrogen Peroxide Stress Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2007; 51(1): 169 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Masco, K. Van Hoorde, E. De Brandt, J. Swings, and G. Huys Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bifidobacterium strains from humans, animals and probiotic products J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 85 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Klare, C. Konstabel, S. Muller-Bertling, R. Reissbrodt, G. Huys, M. Vancanneyt, J. Swings, H. Goossens, and W. Witte Evaluation of New Broth Media for Microdilution Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Lactobacilli, Pediococci, Lactococci, and Bifidobacteria Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 71(12): 8982 - 8986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Margolles, J. A. Moreno, D. van Sinderen, and C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilan Macrolide Resistance Mediated by a Bifidobacterium breve Membrane Protein Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4379 - 4381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moubareck, F. Gavini, L. Vaugien, M. J. Butel, and F. Doucet-Populaire Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2005; 55(1): 38 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |