JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76 No. 8 2168-2174
© 1993 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baek, Y. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Baek, Y. J.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bifidobacteria

K. S. Lim 1, C. S. Huh 1, and Y. J. Baek 1

1 Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hankuk Yakult Institute, 449 Wanggok-dong, Euiwang-si, Kyunggi-do, Korea

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 37 strains of bifidobacteria to 18 anti-microbial agents was determined by a macrodilution broth method. Most of the strains used were isolated from commercial yogurts and starters. Tested organisms were usually sensitive to Gram-positive spectrum antibiotics (bacitracin, erythromycin, lincomycin, and vancomycin), and most of the organisms were inhibited by a concentration 4 .5 6 µg/ml. Erythromycin was the most active agent; all strains were inhibited by <.19 µg/ml. ß-Lactam antibiotics (penicillin G, ampicillin, methicillin, and cephalothin), showing a wide range of minimum inhibitory concentration, were less effective than Gram-positive spectrum antibiotics. Most strains were somewhat resistant to cephalothin, exhibiting inhibition at concentrations of 6.25 to 25.0 µg/ml. Test organisms were most resistant to kanamycin, neomycin, paromomycin sulfate, nalidixic acid, and polymyxin B sulfate; inhibition occurred only at ge50 µg/ml, and strains were somewhat less resistant to gentamicin and streptomycin. Susceptibility to nitrofurantoin and tetracycline was variable; minimum inhibitory concentrations ranged from 1.56 to 50.0 and .39 to 50.0 µg/ml, respectively, but chloramphenicol had a narrow range from 1.56 to 6.25 µg/ml.

Key Words: bifidobacteria • macrodilution broth susceptibility test • antimicrobial susceptibility • minimum inhibitory concentration

Submitted on November 6, 1992
Accepted on March 15, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Kheadr, N. Dabour, C. Le Lay, C. Lacroix, and I. Fliss
Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Bifidobacteria as Affected by Oxgall, Acid, and Hydrogen Peroxide Stress
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2007; 51(1): 169 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. Masco, K. Van Hoorde, E. De Brandt, J. Swings, and G. Huys
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bifidobacterium strains from humans, animals and probiotic products
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
I. Klare, C. Konstabel, S. Muller-Bertling, R. Reissbrodt, G. Huys, M. Vancanneyt, J. Swings, H. Goossens, and W. Witte
Evaluation of New Broth Media for Microdilution Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Lactobacilli, Pediococci, Lactococci, and Bifidobacteria
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 71(12): 8982 - 8986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Margolles, J. A. Moreno, D. van Sinderen, and C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilan
Macrolide Resistance Mediated by a Bifidobacterium breve Membrane Protein
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4379 - 4381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Moubareck, F. Gavini, L. Vaugien, M. J. Butel, and F. Doucet-Populaire
Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2005; 55(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.