JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76 No. 5 1466-1478
© 1993 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Keown, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Keown, J. F.

Identification of Factors Causing Heterogeneous Within-Herd Variance Components Using a Structural Model for Variances

K. A. Weigel 1, D. Gianola 1, B. S. Yandell 1, and J. F. Keown 1

1 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Many applications of mixed linear statistical models for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle assume that genetic and residual components of variance are each constant across environments. However, this assumption is violated for production and conformation traits, which can reduce accuracy of selection and cause biases in the proportions of breeding animals chosen from each environment. Best linear unbiased prediction can accommodate heterogeneous variances if the appropriate variance components are known. Variance components may need to be estimated within individual herds using Bayesian or empirical Bayes methods, but such approaches may not yet be computationally feasible on a national basis. For this study, a structural log-linear model for sire and residual variances was used to identify various management factors associated with differences in within-herd variance components. Increases of herd size and within-herd mean were associated with significant increases of within-herd residual variance for milk and fat yields, but residual variance of milk yield decreased slightly as the proportion of registered animals in the herd increased. Type of milking system, silage storage system, DHI testing program, use or nonuse of a TMR, and use or nonuse of automatic milking machine removal devices also significantly affected residual variances. However, differences in sire variances across levels of management factors were not significant.

Key Words: variance components • model

Submitted on September 14, 1992
Accepted on January 4, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. J. Tempelman
Invited review: Assessing experimental designs for research conducted on commercial dairies
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2009; 92(1): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
H. Nakaoka, A. Narita, T. Ibi, Y. Sasae, T. Miyake, T. Yamada, and Y. Sasaki
Effectiveness of adjusting for heterogeneity of variance in genetic evaluation of Japanese Black cattle
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2429 - 2436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
F. F. Cardoso, G. J. M. Rosa, and R. J. Tempelman
Accounting for outliers and heteroskedasticity in multibreed genetic evaluations of postweaning gain of Nelore-Hereford cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 909 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. Rekaya, K. A. Weigel, and D. Gianola
Bayesian Estimation of Parameters of a Structural Model for Genetic Covariances Between Milk Yield in Five Regions of the United States
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1837 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.