JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76 No. 4 1204-1213
© 1993 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brascamp, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Groen, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brascamp, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Groen, A. F.

Economic Appraisal of the Utilization of Genetic Markers in Dairy Cattle Breeding

E. W. Brascamp, J.A.M. Van Arendonk and A. F. Groen

Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Po Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands

Returns from the utilization of genetic markers in breeding programs have been computed in two ways. In the first approach, returns accrue from additionally improved milk yield that was due to marker utilization in selection. In the second approach, changes in returns from semen sales for a breeding organization operating in a competitive market are determined.

The genetic effect of markers is taken to result from preselection of young bulls. Based on the literature, the increase in mean breeding value of young bulls as a result of marker-based preselection was taken to range from .15 to .45 additive genetic standard deviation.

When additive genetic standard deviation is assumed at $67 with an interest rate of 5% and a time horizon of 25 yr, cumulative discounted returns from 1 yr of marker utilization ranged from $7 to $21 per cow for progeny testing and from $20 to $60 for an open nucleus. Additional discounted financial returns from increased semen sales range from $5.0 million to $16.2 million for a situation in which an AI firm utilizes markers during 20 yr and competitors do not follow.

Lower costs are expected as technology improves, and improved statistical analysis should reduce the number of typings required. Thus, utilization of markers is expected to become financially justified.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. C. M. Dekkers
Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E313 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Q. Zhang, D. Boichard, I. Hoeschele, C. Ernst, A. Eggen, B. Murkve, M. Pfister-Genskow, L. A. Witte, F. E. Grignola, P. Uimari, et al.
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Milk Production and Health of Dairy Cattle in a Large Outbred Pedigree
Genetics, August 1, 1998; 149(4): 1959 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Spelman and H. Bovenhuis
Genetic Response from Marker Assisted Selection in an Outbred Population for Differing Marker Bracket Sizes and with Two Identified Quantitative Trait Loci
Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1389 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.