JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76 No. 4 1157-1162
© 1993 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boichard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barbat, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boichard, D.
Right arrow Articles by Barbat, A.

Effect of Holstein Crossbreeding in the French Black and White Cattle Population

Didier Boichard, Bernard Bonaiti and Anne Barbat

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station de Génétique Quantitative et Appliquée, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France

Heterosis and recombination losses of Holstein x European Black and White cattle were estimated for milk, fat, and protein yields and for fat and protein contents from about 12.4 million records collected in France on about 5.6 million cows between 1975 and 1992. The Holstein percentage reached almost 100% by 1980 for AI bulls and increased from 5% in 1970 to 83% in 1990 for cows. Crossbreeding parameters, including a nonadditive effect that was due to the breed composition, were estimated with an animal model. Heterosis reached 2 to 2.5% for yield traits and was very low for fat and protein contents. For yields, estimates of recombination losses were negative and reached 40 to 86% of heterosis. Recombination losses seemed to be slightly positive for contents. For yield traits, omission of these crossbreeding parameters (as is generally the case) for genetic evaluation led to an overestimation of the genetic difference between strains by 10% and to a downward bias of the within-strain genetic trend by 10 to 20%.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. D. Dechow, G. W. Rogers, J. B. Cooper, M. I. Phelps, and A. L. Mosholder
Milk, Fat, Protein, Somatic Cell Score, and Days Open Among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and Their Crosses
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3542 - 3549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick
Short Communication: Effect of Environment on the Expression of Breed and Heterosis Effects for Production Traits
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1548 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. M. VanRaden and A. H. Sanders
Economic Merit of Crossbred and Purebred US Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2003; 86(3): 1036 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.