JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 76 No. 1 293-299
© 1993 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oetzel, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nordlund, K. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oetzel, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nordlund, K. V.

A Comparison of On-Farm Methods for Estimating the Dry Matter Content of Feed Ingredients

G. R. Oetzel, F. P. Villalba, W. J. Goodger and K. V. Nordlund

Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

On-farm methods for determining the DM content of ensiled feed ingredients were evaluated to determine ease of use, time required to conduct the determination, repeatability, and accuracy relative to a standard drying method. Methods evaluated were sequential drying in a microwave oven, Koster tester method, and electronic moisture tester method. A drying oven was used as the standard drying method. Feed ingredients evaluated were alfalfa silage, corn silage, and high moisture shelled corn (unground kernels). All on-farm methods gave highly repeatable DM results. The microwave oven method was more accurate than the standard method but required the most time to perform. The Koster tester tended to underdry feed ingredients and was not as repeatable as the microwave method. The electronic moisture tester was comparable with the other on-farm methods for alfalfa silage and most closely agreed with the standard method for high moisture shelled corn. However, compared with the standard method, the electronic moisture tester did not accurately determine the DM content of corn silage. The electronic moisture tester required the least operator skill and time.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. C. Stone
Nutritional Approaches to Minimize Subacute Ruminal Acidosis and Laminitis in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E13 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.