JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 9 2605-2617
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, F. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owens, F. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, C. F.

External and Internal Markers for Appraising Site and Extent of Digestion in Ruminants

Fredric N. Owens 1 and Christa F. Hanson 1

1 Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078

Digesta markers are used routinely to calculate fecal output and to estimate kinetics within the digestive tract. A marker suitable for estimating fecal output may not be a suitable kinetic marker because of problems with marker migration, phase separation, inhibition of digestion, osmotic effects within the gut, and quantitation. Marker validity should be checked when possible based on alternative methods (e.g., fecal output and ruminal evacuation). Certain parameters, such as pool size and passage rate, that can be estimated with markers cannot be measured by other noninvasive procedures. Nevertheless, only when marker results are verified by other methods can one evaluate the magnitude of error associated with assumptions inherent in marker mathematics (steady state, instantaneous mixing, and first-order kinetics). When marker results do not meet expectations, marker failure, rather than inadequate knowledge of gastrointestinal function or analytical difficulties, is blamed. No marker is ideal, but research to compare markers is useless if results are not related to direct flow or output measurements. Marker results often are adjusted for marker recovery based on the premise that analysis is precise and that losses are constant. Such adjustment is appropriate only if the error is analytical and proportional. Despite imprecision in marker procedures, inherent variation may be small relative to other sources of variation (e.g., gut physiology, diet, environment, and feed intake). Even though absolute values may be imprecise and inaccurate, marker-based estimates usually provide reliable information about the direction and extent of kinetic changes induced by treatments.

Key Words: digestibility markers • retention • digesta • digestive tract motility

Submitted on September 3, 1991
Accepted on March 4, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. Bucking and C. M. Wood
Water dynamics in the digestive tract of the freshwater rainbow trout during the processing of a single meal
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2006; 209(10): 1883 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Worley, A. Clearfield, and W. C. Ellis
Binding affinity and capacities for ytterbium(3+) and hafnium(4+) by chemical entities of plant tissue fragments
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3307 - 3314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
W. C. Ellis, M. J. Wylie, and J. H. Matis
Validity of specifically applied rare earth elements and compartmental models for estimating flux of undigested plant tissue residues through the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2753 - 2758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.