JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 9 2569-2577
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruhn, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yaffee, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bruhn, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yaffee, M.

Consumer Attitudes and Market Potential for Dairy Products Utilizing Fat Substitutes

Christine M. Bruhn 1, Anne Cotter 2, Katherine Diaz-Knauf 3, Jeanette Sutherlin 4, Estella West 5, Norma Wightman 6, Eunice Williamson 7, and Michele Yaffee 3

1 Center for Consumer Research, University of California, Davis 95616
2 Orange County Cooperative Extension, Anaheim, CA 92805
3 Department of Consumer Sciences, University of California, Davis 95616
4 Fresno County Cooperative Extension, Fresno, CA 93702
5 Santa Clara County Cooperative Extension, San Jose, CA 95126
6 San Luis Obispo Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
7 Riverside County Cooperative Extension, Moreno Valley, CA 92387

Concern about the impact of diet on health has led consumers to reduce the consumption of foods perceived as being high in fat. This study quantifies consumer concern about dietary fat, identifies foods perceived as being high in fat, and explores attitudes toward, and interest in, purchasing dairy foods in which the fat has been reduced by a fat substitute.

Consumer attitudes assessed in focus groups were quantified in a mail survey of 2000 California households (1667 deliverable questionnaires) with a 53% return rate (897 returned).

Taste, safety, and nutrition were most important in food selection. Seventy-eight percent of respondents avoided some foods because of nutrient content. Nutritive factors considered most important were total fat content, cholesterol, and saturated:unsaturated fats. Although only about one-third of the population had heard of the fat substitute, Simplesse®, about 60% thought foods containing this fat substitute would be healthier than traditional products. People were unsure of the safety of fat substitutes; food safety and nutritional advice from the American Medical Association and nutrition experts was considered to be most credible. About half of the consumers were ready to try reduced-fat products and willing to pay a little extra for them. They indicated that, if they liked the taste, they would eat more lower fat products made with fat replacers than traditionally made products.

Key Words: fat substitutes • consumer attitudes • Simplesse®

Submitted on December 2, 1991
Accepted on April 20, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Food Science and Technology InternationalHome page
E. X. Barrios and E. Costell
Review: Use of Methods of Research into Consumers' Opinions and Attitudes in Food Research
Food Science and Technology International, December 1, 2004; 10(6): 359 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.