JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 6 1651-1659
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meuwissen, T.H.E.
Right arrow Articles by Van Arendonk, J.A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meuwissen, T.H.E.
Right arrow Articles by Van Arendonk, J.A.M.

Potential Improvements in Rate of Genetic Gain from Marker-Assisted Selection in Dairy Cattle Breeding Schemes

T.H.E. Meuwissen 1 and J.A.M. Van Arendonk 2

1 Research Institute for Animal Production "Schoonoord", PO Box 501, 3700 AM Zeist, The Netherlands
2 Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands

The value of marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes is predicted by a deterministic model. In these schemes, associations between markers and milk production were assessed from production records of daughters of a grandsire by a multiple regression model with random marker effects. By tracing markers from the grandsire to grandoffspring, deviations of grandoffspring from their full-sib family mean were predicted. Predictions of the within-family variance of the grandoffspring accounted for by markers amounted to up to 13.3%. This figure decreased when the number of daughters of the grandsire analyzed decreased and, less markedly, when the distance between flanking markers increased.

Prediction of within-family deviations hardly improved rates of genetic gain in conventional progeny testing schemes; equal numbers of young bulls were born annually. Genetic gain and improvement of genetic gain because of prediction of within-family deviations were much higher in nucleus schemes. In these schemes, with short optimized generation intervals, conventional selection was mainly for pedigree information and did not use the within-family variance. Analysis of highly polymorphic markers in daughters of both grandsires accounted for 4.1 to 13.3% of the within-family variance, which increased rates of gain by 9.5 to 25.8% and 7.7 to 22.4% in open and closed nucleus schemes, respectively. Risk of breeding schemes, measured by the variance of the selection response, was not increased by the use of markers.

Key Words: markers • selection • dairy cattle • breeding schemes

Submitted on June 17, 1991
Accepted on February 11, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Ansari-Mahyari, A. C. Sorensen, M. S. Lund, H. Thomsen, and P. Berg
Across-Family Marker-Assisted Selection Using Selective Genotyping Strategies in Dairy Cattle Breeding Schemes
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1628 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. F. Kearney, P. R. Amer, and B. Villanueva
Cumulative Discounted Expressions of Sire Genotypes for the Complex Vertebral Malformation and {beta}-Casein Loci in Commercial Dairy Herds
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4426 - 4433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. Villanueva, R. Pong-Wong, J. Fernandez, and M. A. Toro
Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2005; 83(8): 1747 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Schrooten, H. Bovenhuis, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma
Genetic Progress in Multistage Dairy Cattle Breeding Schemes Using Genetic Markers
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1569 - 1581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Schrooten, M. C. A. M. Bink, and H. Bovenhuis
Whole Genome Scan to Detect Chromosomal Regions Affecting Multiple Traits in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3550 - 3560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. Abdel-Azim and A. E. Freeman
Effects of Including a Quantitative Trait Locus in Selection Under Different Waiting Plans of Young Bulls
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2003; 86(2): 667 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Stella, M. M. Lohuis, G. Pagnacco, and G. B. Jansen
Strategies for Continual Application of Marker-Assisted Selection in an Open Nucleus Population
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2002; 85(9): 2358 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. Abdel-Azim and A. E. Freeman
Superiority of QTL-Assisted Selection in Dairy Cattle Breeding Schemes
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2002; 85(7): 1869 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Q. Zhang, D. Boichard, I. Hoeschele, C. Ernst, A. Eggen, B. Murkve, M. Pfister-Genskow, L. A. Witte, F. E. Grignola, P. Uimari, et al.
Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Milk Production and Health of Dairy Cattle in a Large Outbred Pedigree
Genetics, August 1, 1998; 149(4): 1959 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Spelman and H. Bovenhuis
Genetic Response from Marker Assisted Selection in an Outbred Population for Differing Marker Bracket Sizes and with Two Identified Quantitative Trait Loci
Genetics, March 1, 1998; 148(3): 1389 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
D. W. HEYEN, J. I. WELLER, M. RON, M. BAND, J. E. BEEVER, E. FELDMESSER, Y. DA, G. R. WIGGANS, P. M. VANRADEN, and H. A. LEWIN
A genome scan for QTL influencing milk production and health traits in dairy cattle
Physiol Genomics, November 11, 1999; 1(3): 165 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.