JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 75 No. 5 1224-1232
© 1992 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingawa, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gough, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ingawa, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gough, R. H.

Evaluation of a Gel Teat Cleaning and Sanitizing Compound for Premilking Hygiene

K. H. Ingawa 1, R. W. Adkinson 1, and R. H. Gough 1

1 Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Dairy Science, Baton Rouge 70803-4404

A gel was developed and tested for cleaning and sanitizing cow teats for milking. Thirty lactating Holstein cows were divided into three groups of 10 each and assigned to three premilking hygiene treatments for 10 wk as follows: 1) cleaning teats with gel, allowing 30 s of contact time, and wiping residual gel off with paper towel; 2) washing teats with water and drying them with paper towel; 3) washing teats with water, drying with paper towel, predipping with .5% iodophor solution, allowing 30 s of contact time, and drying with paper towel. Individual cow composite milk and teat end swab samples were collected. The gel and predip treatments resulted in less bacterial contamination of milk and teat ends. The gel treatment had an advantage over wash and predip treatments in lower SCC and reduced mastitis. Parlor throughput was greatest for gel and wash treatments. The wash treatment group had highest SCC, bacteria in milk and on teat ends, and mastitis. Milk iodine content was low and similar for the three treatments. Daily milk production and fat and protein percentages were not affected by treatments. The gel treatment was effective, efficient, and provided good hygiene.

Key Words: gel • hygiene • mastitis • milk quality

Submitted on September 16, 1991
Accepted on January 13, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Magnusson, A. Christiansson, B. Svensson, and C. Kolstrup
Effect of different premilking manual teat-cleaning methods on bacterial spores in milk.
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 3866 - 3875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.